Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

CAMEL (band)
VriendenThe Plan (5)
Ton Scherpenzeel
Europe (5)Chiel van PraagEARTH AND FIRESynspirationKAYAKKajem

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 18 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 5 days ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

High Tide Formation

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • CAMEL (band)
    CAMEL (band) band photo
  • EARTH AND FIRE
  • Europe (5)
  • Kajem
  • KAYAK
  • Synspiration
  • The Plan (5)
  • Vrienden

Connected Musicians

  • Chiel van Praag
  • Pim Koopman
  • Ton Scherpenzeel
    Ton Scherpenzeel band photo

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.52% of network
(12.7M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.52%)
  • KAYAK (1.52%)
  • Vrienden (0.67%)
  • EARTH AND FIRE (0.17%)
  • Europe (5) (0.17%)
  • Kajem (0.17%)
  • Synspiration (0.17%)
  • The Plan (5) (0.17%)
  • Chiel van Praag (0.17%)
  • Pim Koopman (0.17%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
CAMEL (band) 81.48%Ton Scherpenzeel 13.64%
Influence Score
i
8.33% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (8.33%)
  • CAMEL (band) (8.33%)
  • Ton Scherpenzeel (8.33%)
  • KAYAK (8.33%)
  • EARTH AND FIRE (8.33%)
  • Europe (5) (8.33%)
  • Kajem (8.33%)
  • Synspiration (8.33%)
  • The Plan (5) (8.33%)
  • Vrienden (8.33%)
  • Chiel van Praag (8.33%)
  • Pim Koopman (8.33%)
Direct Connections 6

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 3) = 3
$outbound = max(1, 3) = 3

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 3 * 3 = 9
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 3 / 3 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 11 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 9 *
                           ( 484 [CAMEL (band)] *
                            81 [Ton Scherpenzeel] *
                            9 [KAYAK] *
                            1 [EARTH AND FIRE] *
                            1 [Europe (5)] *
                            1 [Kajem] *
                            1 [Synspiration] *
                            1 [The Plan (5)] *
                            4 [Vrienden] *
                            1 [Chiel van Praag] *
                            1 [Pim Koopman]
                           )

                         = 12.7M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [CAMEL (band)] *
                            1 [Ton Scherpenzeel] *
                            1 [KAYAK] *
                            1 [EARTH AND FIRE] *
                            1 [Europe (5)] *
                            1 [Kajem] *
                            1 [Synspiration] *
                            1 [The Plan (5)] *
                            1 [Vrienden] *
                            1 [Chiel van Praag] *
                            1 [Pim Koopman]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 3 Tags on post
Inbound 3 Posts tagging this
Connections 11 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 9
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.52% (12.7M overall)
  • This Post (1.52%)
  • KAYAK (1.52%)
  • Vrienden (0.67%)
  • EARTH AND FIRE (0.17%)
  • Europe (5) (0.17%)
  • Kajem (0.17%)
  • Synspiration (0.17%)
  • The Plan (5) (0.17%)
  • Chiel van Praag (0.17%)
  • Pim Koopman (0.17%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
CAMEL (band) 81.48%Ton Scherpenzeel 13.64%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
8.33% (1 overall)
  • This Post (8.33%)
  • CAMEL (band) (8.33%)
  • Ton Scherpenzeel (8.33%)
  • KAYAK (8.33%)
  • EARTH AND FIRE (8.33%)
  • Europe (5) (8.33%)
  • Kajem (8.33%)
  • Synspiration (8.33%)
  • The Plan (5) (8.33%)
  • Vrienden (8.33%)
  • Chiel van Praag (8.33%)
  • Pim Koopman (8.33%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
CAMEL (band) ↗
Str: 484Inf: 1
Ton Scherpenzeel ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
KAYAK ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
EARTH AND FIRE ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Europe (5) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Kajem ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Synspiration ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
The Plan (5) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Vrienden ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Chiel van Praag ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pim Koopman ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Pim Koopman ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Chiel van Praag ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Vrienden ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
The Plan (5) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Synspiration ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Kajem ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Europe (5) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
EARTH AND FIRE ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
KAYAK ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Ton Scherpenzeel ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
CAMEL (band) ↗
Str: 484Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (3)
Chiel van Praag
Pim Koopman
Ton Scherpenzeel
Inbound Posts (3)
Ton Scherpenzeel
Chiel van Praag
Pim Koopman
Last calculated: Jun 11, 10:47 AM
60

Related Content

No related content found.