Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Skitliv
Ivar NikolaisenSilver (8)Skitliv (2)
Kvelertak
The Good The Bad And THe ZuglyBouquet (10)AbsurdÂ2

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 3 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Happy Dagger

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • AbsurdÂ2
  • Bouquet (10)
  • Kvelertak
    Kvelertak band photo
  • Silver (8)
  • Skitliv
    Skitliv band photo
  • Skitliv (2)
  • The Good The Bad And THe Zugly

Connected Musicians

  • Ivar Nikolaisen

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.30% of network
(796.59M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.30%)
  • Ivar Nikolaisen (18.99%)
  • Skitliv (14.54%)
  • AbsurdÂ2 (2.67%)
  • Skitliv (2) (2.67%)
  • Bouquet (10) (1.19%)
  • Silver (8) (1.19%)
  • The Good The Bad And THe Zugly (0.30%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Kvelertak 58.16%
Influence Score
i
11.11% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Kvelertak (11.11%)
  • Skitliv (11.11%)
  • Ivar Nikolaisen (11.11%)
  • AbsurdÂ2 (11.11%)
  • Bouquet (10) (11.11%)
  • Silver (8) (11.11%)
  • Skitliv (2) (11.11%)
  • The Good The Bad And THe Zugly (11.11%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 196 [Kvelertak] *
                            49 [Skitliv] *
                            64 [Ivar Nikolaisen] *
                            9 [AbsurdÂ2] *
                            4 [Bouquet (10)] *
                            4 [Silver (8)] *
                            9 [Skitliv (2)] *
                            1 [The Good The Bad And THe Zugly]
                           )

                         = 796.59M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Kvelertak] *
                            1 [Skitliv] *
                            1 [Ivar Nikolaisen] *
                            1 [AbsurdÂ2] *
                            1 [Bouquet (10)] *
                            1 [Silver (8)] *
                            1 [Skitliv (2)] *
                            1 [The Good The Bad And THe Zugly]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.30% (796.59M overall)
  • This Post (0.30%)
  • Ivar Nikolaisen (18.99%)
  • Skitliv (14.54%)
  • AbsurdÂ2 (2.67%)
  • Skitliv (2) (2.67%)
  • Bouquet (10) (1.19%)
  • Silver (8) (1.19%)
  • The Good The Bad And THe Zugly (0.30%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Kvelertak 58.16%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.11% (1 overall)
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Kvelertak (11.11%)
  • Skitliv (11.11%)
  • Ivar Nikolaisen (11.11%)
  • AbsurdÂ2 (11.11%)
  • Bouquet (10) (11.11%)
  • Silver (8) (11.11%)
  • Skitliv (2) (11.11%)
  • The Good The Bad And THe Zugly (11.11%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Kvelertak ↗
Str: 196Inf: 1
Skitliv ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Ivar Nikolaisen ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
AbsurdÂ2 ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Bouquet (10) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Silver (8) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Skitliv (2) ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
The Good The Bad And THe Zugly ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
The Good The Bad And THe Zugly ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Skitliv (2) ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Silver (8) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Bouquet (10) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
AbsurdÂ2 ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Ivar Nikolaisen ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Skitliv ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Kvelertak ↗
Str: 196Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Ivar Nikolaisen
Inbound Posts (1)
Ivar Nikolaisen
Last calculated: Jun 18, 3:01 PM
34

Related Content

No related content found.