Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

JÃ ̧rn Inge Tunsberg
Immortal
Stig HagenesRemi AndersenJanto GarmanslundNagel (4)

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 11 hours ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 3 days ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 1 week ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Hades Almighty

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Immortal
    Immortal band photo

Connected Musicians

  • Janto Garmanslund
  • JÃ ̧rn Inge Tunsberg
  • Nagel (4)
  • Remi Andersen
  • Stig Hagenes

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
9.16% of network
(24K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (9.16%)
  • JÃ ̧rn Inge Tunsberg (1.47%)
  • Janto Garmanslund (0.37%)
  • Nagel (4) (0.37%)
  • Remi Andersen (0.37%)
  • Stig Hagenes (0.37%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Immortal 87.91%
Influence Score
i
14.41% of network
(0.9375)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (14.41%)
  • Janto Garmanslund (14.41%)
  • Nagel (4) (14.41%)
  • Remi Andersen (14.41%)
  • Stig Hagenes (14.41%)
  • JÃ ̧rn Inge Tunsberg (14.41%)
  • Immortal (13.51%)
Direct Connections 10

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 5) = 5
$outbound = max(1, 5) = 5

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 5 * 5 = 25
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 5 / 5 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 6 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 25 *
                           ( 1 [Janto Garmanslund] *
                            1 [Nagel (4)] *
                            1 [Remi Andersen] *
                            1 [Stig Hagenes] *
                            4 [JÃ ̧rn Inge Tunsberg] *
                            240 [Immortal]
                           )

                         = 24K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Janto Garmanslund] *
                            1 [Nagel (4)] *
                            1 [Remi Andersen] *
                            1 [Stig Hagenes] *
                            1 [JÃ ̧rn Inge Tunsberg] *
                            0.9375 [Immortal]
                           )

                         = 0.9375
Outbound 5 Tags on post
Inbound 5 Posts tagging this
Connections 6 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 25
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
9.16% (24K overall)
  • This Post (9.16%)
  • JÃ ̧rn Inge Tunsberg (1.47%)
  • Janto Garmanslund (0.37%)
  • Nagel (4) (0.37%)
  • Remi Andersen (0.37%)
  • Stig Hagenes (0.37%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Immortal 87.91%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
14.41% (0.9375 overall)
  • This Post (14.41%)
  • Janto Garmanslund (14.41%)
  • Nagel (4) (14.41%)
  • Remi Andersen (14.41%)
  • Stig Hagenes (14.41%)
  • JÃ ̧rn Inge Tunsberg (14.41%)
  • Immortal (13.51%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Janto Garmanslund ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Nagel (4) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Remi Andersen ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Stig Hagenes ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
JÃ ̧rn Inge Tunsberg ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Immortal ↗
Str: 240Inf: 0.9375
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Immortal ↗
Str: 240Inf: 0.9375
JÃ ̧rn Inge Tunsberg ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Stig Hagenes ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Remi Andersen ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Nagel (4) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Janto Garmanslund ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (5)
Janto Garmanslund
JÃ ̧rn Inge Tunsberg
Nagel (4)
Remi Andersen
Stig Hagenes
Inbound Posts (5)
Janto Garmanslund
Nagel (4)
Remi Andersen
Stig Hagenes
JÃ ̧rn Inge Tunsberg
Last calculated: Jul 24, 10:45 PM
37

Related Content

No related content found.