Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

The Hawks (2)The Anger BrothersGreg GodovitzThe Carpet FrogsEd PillingAmphitheatrum anatomicum, Fludd, 1623GoddoAmphitheatrum anatomicumBrian Pilling

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Fludd

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Related Images

Robert Fludd
1623

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Amphitheatrum anatomicum, Fludd, 1623
  • Goddo
  • The Anger Brothers
  • The Carpet Frogs
  • The Hawks (2)

Connected Musicians

  • Amphitheatrum anatomicum
  • Brian Pilling
  • Ed Pilling
  • Greg Godovitz

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
9.36% of network
(17.64M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (9.36%)
  • Greg Godovitz (9.36%)
  • Goddo (3.37%)
  • Amphitheatrum anatomicum, Fludd, 1623 (1.50%)
  • Amphitheatrum anatomicum (1.50%)
  • Brian Pilling (0.37%)
  • Ed Pilling (0.37%)
  • The Anger Brothers (0.37%)
  • The Carpet Frogs (0.37%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
The Hawks (2) 73.41%
Influence Score
i
10.00% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • Brian Pilling (10.00%)
  • Ed Pilling (10.00%)
  • Greg Godovitz (10.00%)
  • Amphitheatrum anatomicum, Fludd, 1623 (10.00%)
  • Amphitheatrum anatomicum (10.00%)
  • Goddo (10.00%)
  • The Hawks (2) (10.00%)
  • The Anger Brothers (10.00%)
  • The Carpet Frogs (10.00%)
Direct Connections 10

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 5) = 5
$outbound = max(1, 5) = 5

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 5 * 5 = 25
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 5 / 5 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 9 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 25 *
                           ( 1 [Brian Pilling] *
                            1 [Ed Pilling] *
                            25 [Greg Godovitz] *
                            4 [Amphitheatrum anatomicum, Fludd, 1623] *
                            4 [Amphitheatrum anatomicum] *
                            9 [Goddo] *
                            196 [The Hawks (2)] *
                            1 [The Anger Brothers] *
                            1 [The Carpet Frogs]
                           )

                         = 17.64M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Brian Pilling] *
                            1 [Ed Pilling] *
                            1 [Greg Godovitz] *
                            1 [Amphitheatrum anatomicum, Fludd, 1623] *
                            1 [Amphitheatrum anatomicum] *
                            1 [Goddo] *
                            1 [The Hawks (2)] *
                            1 [The Anger Brothers] *
                            1 [The Carpet Frogs]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 5 Tags on post
Inbound 5 Posts tagging this
Connections 9 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 25
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
9.36% (17.64M overall)
  • This Post (9.36%)
  • Greg Godovitz (9.36%)
  • Goddo (3.37%)
  • Amphitheatrum anatomicum, Fludd, 1623 (1.50%)
  • Amphitheatrum anatomicum (1.50%)
  • Brian Pilling (0.37%)
  • Ed Pilling (0.37%)
  • The Anger Brothers (0.37%)
  • The Carpet Frogs (0.37%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
The Hawks (2) 73.41%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
10.00% (1 overall)
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • Brian Pilling (10.00%)
  • Ed Pilling (10.00%)
  • Greg Godovitz (10.00%)
  • Amphitheatrum anatomicum, Fludd, 1623 (10.00%)
  • Amphitheatrum anatomicum (10.00%)
  • Goddo (10.00%)
  • The Hawks (2) (10.00%)
  • The Anger Brothers (10.00%)
  • The Carpet Frogs (10.00%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Brian Pilling ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ed Pilling ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Greg Godovitz ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Amphitheatrum anatomicum, Fludd, 1623 ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Amphitheatrum anatomicum ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Goddo ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
The Hawks (2) ↗
Str: 196Inf: 1
The Anger Brothers ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
The Carpet Frogs ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
The Carpet Frogs ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
The Anger Brothers ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
The Hawks (2) ↗
Str: 196Inf: 1
Goddo ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Amphitheatrum anatomicum ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Amphitheatrum anatomicum, Fludd, 1623 ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Greg Godovitz ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Ed Pilling ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Brian Pilling ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (5)
Amphitheatrum anatomicum
Amphitheatrum anatomicum, Fludd, 1623
Brian Pilling
Ed Pilling
Greg Godovitz
Inbound Posts (5)
Brian Pilling
Ed Pilling
Greg Godovitz
Amphitheatrum anatomicum, Fludd, 1623
Amphitheatrum anatomicum
Last calculated: Jun 25, 12:58 AM
41

Related Content

No related content found.