Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Sharon GrzelinskiAmber AsylumDaniel StrubleEric WoodShawn AlbroEric Wood (2)Casey MejiaTony StarcevichSean Pavey

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 1 day ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 5 days ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Five Pointe O

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Amber Asylum

Connected Musicians

  • Casey Mejia
  • Daniel Struble
  • Eric Wood
  • Eric Wood (2)
  • Sean Pavey
  • Sharon Grzelinski
  • Shawn Albro
  • Tony Starcevich

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
19.34% of network
(65.5K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (19.34%)
  • Eric Wood (1.21%)
  • Casey Mejia (0.30%)
  • Daniel Struble (0.30%)
  • Shawn Albro (0.30%)
  • Tony Starcevich (0.30%)
  • Eric Wood (2) (0.30%)
  • Sean Pavey (0.30%)
  • Sharon Grzelinski (0.30%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Amber Asylum 77.34%
Influence Score
i
10.00% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • Casey Mejia (10.00%)
  • Daniel Struble (10.00%)
  • Eric Wood (10.00%)
  • Shawn Albro (10.00%)
  • Tony Starcevich (10.00%)
  • Eric Wood (2) (10.00%)
  • Sean Pavey (10.00%)
  • Sharon Grzelinski (10.00%)
  • Amber Asylum (10.00%)
Direct Connections 16

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 8) = 8
$outbound = max(1, 8) = 8

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 8 * 8 = 64
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 8 / 8 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 9 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 64 *
                           ( 1 [Casey Mejia] *
                            1 [Daniel Struble] *
                            4 [Eric Wood] *
                            1 [Shawn Albro] *
                            1 [Tony Starcevich] *
                            1 [Eric Wood (2)] *
                            1 [Sean Pavey] *
                            1 [Sharon Grzelinski] *
                            256 [Amber Asylum]
                           )

                         = 65.5K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Casey Mejia] *
                            1 [Daniel Struble] *
                            1 [Eric Wood] *
                            1 [Shawn Albro] *
                            1 [Tony Starcevich] *
                            1 [Eric Wood (2)] *
                            1 [Sean Pavey] *
                            1 [Sharon Grzelinski] *
                            1 [Amber Asylum]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 8 Tags on post
Inbound 8 Posts tagging this
Connections 9 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 64
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
19.34% (65.5K overall)
  • This Post (19.34%)
  • Eric Wood (1.21%)
  • Casey Mejia (0.30%)
  • Daniel Struble (0.30%)
  • Shawn Albro (0.30%)
  • Tony Starcevich (0.30%)
  • Eric Wood (2) (0.30%)
  • Sean Pavey (0.30%)
  • Sharon Grzelinski (0.30%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Amber Asylum 77.34%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
10.00% (1 overall)
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • Casey Mejia (10.00%)
  • Daniel Struble (10.00%)
  • Eric Wood (10.00%)
  • Shawn Albro (10.00%)
  • Tony Starcevich (10.00%)
  • Eric Wood (2) (10.00%)
  • Sean Pavey (10.00%)
  • Sharon Grzelinski (10.00%)
  • Amber Asylum (10.00%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Casey Mejia ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Daniel Struble ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Eric Wood ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Shawn Albro ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tony Starcevich ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Eric Wood (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Sean Pavey ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Sharon Grzelinski ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Amber Asylum ↗
Str: 256Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Amber Asylum ↗
Str: 256Inf: 1
Sharon Grzelinski ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Sean Pavey ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Eric Wood (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tony Starcevich ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Shawn Albro ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Eric Wood ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Daniel Struble ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Casey Mejia ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (8)
Casey Mejia
Daniel Struble
Eric Wood
Eric Wood (2)
Sean Pavey
Sharon Grzelinski
Shawn Albro
Tony Starcevich
Inbound Posts (8)
Casey Mejia
Daniel Struble
Eric Wood
Shawn Albro
Tony Starcevich
Eric Wood (2)
Sean Pavey
Sharon Grzelinski
Last calculated: Jun 11, 8:42 PM
16

Related Content

No related content found.