Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Teemu Saari (2)
Timo Kontio
Havoc UnitVeijo PulkkinenKena StrömsholmJani Kuoppamaa (2)Teemu Kilponen

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 1 day ago
Comments: 0

Francesca Ladybird
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Matthew Leech
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 1

Jessica
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Festerday

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Havoc Unit

Connected Musicians

  • Jani Kuoppamaa (2)
  • Kena Strömsholm
  • Teemu Kilponen
  • Teemu Saari (2)
  • Timo Kontio
    Timo Kontio band photo
  • Veijo Pulkkinen

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
56.25% of network
(9.2K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (56.25%)
  • Timo Kontio (6.25%)
  • Kena Strömsholm (6.25%)
  • Jani Kuoppamaa (2) (1.56%)
  • Teemu Kilponen (1.56%)
  • Teemu Saari (2) (1.56%)
  • Veijo Pulkkinen (1.56%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Havoc Unit 25.00%
Influence Score
i
12.50% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Timo Kontio (12.50%)
  • Jani Kuoppamaa (2) (12.50%)
  • Teemu Kilponen (12.50%)
  • Teemu Saari (2) (12.50%)
  • Veijo Pulkkinen (12.50%)
  • Kena Strömsholm (12.50%)
  • Havoc Unit (12.50%)
Direct Connections 12

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 6) = 6
$outbound = max(1, 6) = 6

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 6 * 6 = 36
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 6 / 6 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 7 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 36 *
                           ( 4 [Timo Kontio] *
                            1 [Jani Kuoppamaa (2)] *
                            1 [Teemu Kilponen] *
                            1 [Teemu Saari (2)] *
                            1 [Veijo Pulkkinen] *
                            4 [Kena Strömsholm] *
                            16 [Havoc Unit]
                           )

                         = 9.2K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Timo Kontio] *
                            1 [Jani Kuoppamaa (2)] *
                            1 [Teemu Kilponen] *
                            1 [Teemu Saari (2)] *
                            1 [Veijo Pulkkinen] *
                            1 [Kena Strömsholm] *
                            1 [Havoc Unit]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 6 Tags on post
Inbound 6 Posts tagging this
Connections 7 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 36
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
56.25% (9.2K overall)
  • This Post (56.25%)
  • Timo Kontio (6.25%)
  • Kena Strömsholm (6.25%)
  • Jani Kuoppamaa (2) (1.56%)
  • Teemu Kilponen (1.56%)
  • Teemu Saari (2) (1.56%)
  • Veijo Pulkkinen (1.56%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Havoc Unit 25.00%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
12.50% (1 overall)
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Timo Kontio (12.50%)
  • Jani Kuoppamaa (2) (12.50%)
  • Teemu Kilponen (12.50%)
  • Teemu Saari (2) (12.50%)
  • Veijo Pulkkinen (12.50%)
  • Kena Strömsholm (12.50%)
  • Havoc Unit (12.50%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Timo Kontio ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Jani Kuoppamaa (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Teemu Kilponen ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Teemu Saari (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Veijo Pulkkinen ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Kena Strömsholm ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Havoc Unit ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Havoc Unit ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Kena Strömsholm ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Veijo Pulkkinen ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Teemu Saari (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Teemu Kilponen ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jani Kuoppamaa (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Timo Kontio ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (6)
Jani Kuoppamaa (2)
Kena Strömsholm
Teemu Kilponen
Teemu Saari (2)
Timo Kontio
Veijo Pulkkinen
Inbound Posts (6)
Timo Kontio
Jani Kuoppamaa (2)
Teemu Kilponen
Teemu Saari (2)
Veijo Pulkkinen
Kena Strömsholm
Last calculated: Sep 24, 7:39 PM
26

Related Content

No related content found.