Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

The Michael Schenker Group
Stuart Hamm
Jane Getter Premonition
Stu Hamm
Le Quartet BashGHSStu Hamm Band

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 16 hours ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 4 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Fender Stu Hamm Urge II Bass

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • GHS
  • Jane Getter Premonition
  • Le Quartet Bash
  • Stu Hamm Band
  • The Michael Schenker Group

Connected Musicians

  • Stu Hamm
    Stu Hamm band photo
  • Stuart Hamm
    Stuart Hamm band photo

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.63% of network
(2.81B)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.63%)
  • Stuart Hamm (5.69%)
  • Stu Hamm (5.69%)
  • Jane Getter Premonition (2.53%)
  • GHS (0.63%)
  • Le Quartet Bash (0.63%)
  • Stu Hamm Band (0.63%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
The Michael Schenker Group 83.57%
Influence Score
i
12.50% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Stuart Hamm (12.50%)
  • The Michael Schenker Group (12.50%)
  • GHS (12.50%)
  • Jane Getter Premonition (12.50%)
  • Le Quartet Bash (12.50%)
  • Stu Hamm Band (12.50%)
  • Stu Hamm (12.50%)
Direct Connections 4

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 2) = 2
$outbound = max(1, 2) = 2

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 2 * 2 = 4
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 2 / 2 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 7 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 4 *
                           ( 36 [Stuart Hamm] *
                            529 [The Michael Schenker Group] *
                            4 [GHS] *
                            16 [Jane Getter Premonition] *
                            4 [Le Quartet Bash] *
                            4 [Stu Hamm Band] *
                            36 [Stu Hamm]
                           )

                         = 2.81B

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Stuart Hamm] *
                            1 [The Michael Schenker Group] *
                            1 [GHS] *
                            1 [Jane Getter Premonition] *
                            1 [Le Quartet Bash] *
                            1 [Stu Hamm Band] *
                            1 [Stu Hamm]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 2 Tags on post
Inbound 2 Posts tagging this
Connections 7 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 4
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.63% (2.81B overall)
  • This Post (0.63%)
  • Stuart Hamm (5.69%)
  • Stu Hamm (5.69%)
  • Jane Getter Premonition (2.53%)
  • GHS (0.63%)
  • Le Quartet Bash (0.63%)
  • Stu Hamm Band (0.63%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
The Michael Schenker Group 83.57%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
12.50% (1 overall)
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Stuart Hamm (12.50%)
  • The Michael Schenker Group (12.50%)
  • GHS (12.50%)
  • Jane Getter Premonition (12.50%)
  • Le Quartet Bash (12.50%)
  • Stu Hamm Band (12.50%)
  • Stu Hamm (12.50%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Stuart Hamm ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
The Michael Schenker Group ↗
Str: 529Inf: 1
GHS ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Jane Getter Premonition ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Le Quartet Bash ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Stu Hamm Band ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Stu Hamm ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Stu Hamm ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Stu Hamm Band ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Le Quartet Bash ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Jane Getter Premonition ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
GHS ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
The Michael Schenker Group ↗
Str: 529Inf: 1
Stuart Hamm ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (2)
Stu Hamm
Stuart Hamm
Inbound Posts (2)
Stuart Hamm
Stu Hamm
Last calculated: Jul 3, 11:55 AM
34

Related Content

No related content found.