Skip to content

Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Method Of DestructionM.O.D.MindfunkMindfunk (2)John MonteChemical WasteBig DismalDragpipe

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 5 days ago
Comments: 0

Francesca Ladybird
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Matthew Leech
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 1

Jessica
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 3 months ago
Comments: 0

Evil Mothers

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Big Dismal
  • Chemical Waste
  • Dragpipe
  • M.O.D.
  • Method Of Destruction
  • Mindfunk
  • Mindfunk (2)

Connected Musicians

  • John Monte

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.11% of network
(107.79B)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.11%)
  • Method Of Destruction (42.83%)
  • M.O.D. (38.65%)
  • Mindfunk (8.67%)
  • John Monte (6.85%)
  • Big Dismal (1.71%)
  • Mindfunk (2) (0.96%)
  • Chemical Waste (0.11%)
  • Dragpipe (0.11%)
Influence Score
i
11.11% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Big Dismal (11.11%)
  • Method Of Destruction (11.11%)
  • M.O.D. (11.11%)
  • Mindfunk (11.11%)
  • John Monte (11.11%)
  • Chemical Waste (11.11%)
  • Dragpipe (11.11%)
  • Mindfunk (2) (11.11%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 16 [Big Dismal] *
                            400 [Method Of Destruction] *
                            361 [M.O.D.] *
                            81 [Mindfunk] *
                            64 [John Monte] *
                            1 [Chemical Waste] *
                            1 [Dragpipe] *
                            9 [Mindfunk (2)]
                           )

                         = 107.79B

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Big Dismal] *
                            1 [Method Of Destruction] *
                            1 [M.O.D.] *
                            1 [Mindfunk] *
                            1 [John Monte] *
                            1 [Chemical Waste] *
                            1 [Dragpipe] *
                            1 [Mindfunk (2)]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.11% (107.79B overall)
  • This Post (0.11%)
  • Method Of Destruction (42.83%)
  • M.O.D. (38.65%)
  • Mindfunk (8.67%)
  • John Monte (6.85%)
  • Big Dismal (1.71%)
  • Mindfunk (2) (0.96%)
  • Chemical Waste (0.11%)
  • Dragpipe (0.11%)
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.11% (1 overall)
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Big Dismal (11.11%)
  • Method Of Destruction (11.11%)
  • M.O.D. (11.11%)
  • Mindfunk (11.11%)
  • John Monte (11.11%)
  • Chemical Waste (11.11%)
  • Dragpipe (11.11%)
  • Mindfunk (2) (11.11%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Big Dismal ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Method Of Destruction ↗
Str: 400Inf: 1
M.O.D. ↗
Str: 361Inf: 1
Mindfunk ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
John Monte ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Chemical Waste ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Dragpipe ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mindfunk (2) ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Mindfunk (2) ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Dragpipe ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Chemical Waste ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
John Monte ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Mindfunk ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
M.O.D. ↗
Str: 361Inf: 1
Method Of Destruction ↗
Str: 400Inf: 1
Big Dismal ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
John Monte
Inbound Posts (1)
John Monte
Last calculated: Oct 4, 4:45 PM
27

Related Content

No related content found.

A Muso community