Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Fall Ov SerafimLars WachtfelsIblis (2)Mayhemic DestructorL WachtfelsZingultusSascha JahnNagelfarCruor

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 6 days ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Endstille

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Fall Ov Serafim
  • Nagelfar

Connected Musicians

  • Cruor
  • Iblis (2)
  • L Wachtfels
  • Lars Wachtfels
  • Mayhemic Destructor
  • Sascha Jahn
  • Zingultus

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
48.70% of network
(134.4K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (48.70%)
  • Zingultus (3.48%)
  • Cruor (0.87%)
  • L Wachtfels (0.87%)
  • Mayhemic Destructor (0.87%)
  • Iblis (2) (0.87%)
  • Lars Wachtfels (0.87%)
  • Sascha Jahn (0.87%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Nagelfar 21.74%Fall Ov Serafim 20.87%
Influence Score
i
5.88% of network
(5.25)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (5.88%)
  • Fall Ov Serafim (40.34%)
  • Cruor (6.72%)
  • L Wachtfels (6.72%)
  • Mayhemic Destructor (6.72%)
  • Zingultus (6.72%)
  • Iblis (2) (6.72%)
  • Lars Wachtfels (6.72%)
  • Sascha Jahn (6.72%)
  • Nagelfar (6.72%)
Direct Connections 15

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 7) = 7
$outbound = max(1, 8) = 8

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 7 * 8 = 56
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 7 / 8 = 0.875

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 9 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 56 *
                           ( 24 [Fall Ov Serafim] *
                            1 [Cruor] *
                            1 [L Wachtfels] *
                            1 [Mayhemic Destructor] *
                            4 [Zingultus] *
                            1 [Iblis (2)] *
                            1 [Lars Wachtfels] *
                            1 [Sascha Jahn] *
                            25 [Nagelfar]
                           )

                         = 134.4K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 0.875 *
                           ( 6 [Fall Ov Serafim] *
                            1 [Cruor] *
                            1 [L Wachtfels] *
                            1 [Mayhemic Destructor] *
                            1 [Zingultus] *
                            1 [Iblis (2)] *
                            1 [Lars Wachtfels] *
                            1 [Sascha Jahn] *
                            1 [Nagelfar]
                           )

                         = 5.25
Outbound 7 Tags on post
Inbound 8 Posts tagging this
Connections 9 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 56
Base Node Influence 0.875
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
48.70% (134.4K overall)
  • This Post (48.70%)
  • Zingultus (3.48%)
  • Cruor (0.87%)
  • L Wachtfels (0.87%)
  • Mayhemic Destructor (0.87%)
  • Iblis (2) (0.87%)
  • Lars Wachtfels (0.87%)
  • Sascha Jahn (0.87%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Nagelfar 21.74%Fall Ov Serafim 20.87%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
5.88% (5.25 overall)
  • This Post (5.88%)
  • Fall Ov Serafim (40.34%)
  • Cruor (6.72%)
  • L Wachtfels (6.72%)
  • Mayhemic Destructor (6.72%)
  • Zingultus (6.72%)
  • Iblis (2) (6.72%)
  • Lars Wachtfels (6.72%)
  • Sascha Jahn (6.72%)
  • Nagelfar (6.72%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Fall Ov Serafim ↗
Str: 24Inf: 6
Cruor ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
L Wachtfels ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mayhemic Destructor ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Zingultus ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Iblis (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Lars Wachtfels ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Sascha Jahn ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Nagelfar ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Nagelfar ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Sascha Jahn ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Lars Wachtfels ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Iblis (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Zingultus ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Mayhemic Destructor ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
L Wachtfels ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Cruor ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Fall Ov Serafim ↗
Str: 24Inf: 6

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (7)
Cruor
Iblis (2)
L Wachtfels
Lars Wachtfels
Mayhemic Destructor
Sascha Jahn
Zingultus
Inbound Posts (8)
Fall Ov Serafim
BROKEN LINK
Cruor
L Wachtfels
Mayhemic Destructor
Zingultus
Iblis (2)
Lars Wachtfels
Sascha Jahn
Last calculated: Jun 13, 12:02 AM
45

Related Content

No related content found.