Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

K. O’BrienGlenn R. SmithPhil Robertson (2)Miles HillTom Christianson (2)Idle EyesTad CampbellBill Meikle

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 2 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 days ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Dudley Welsh

Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook
Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Idle Eyes
  • Miles Hill

Connected Musicians

  • Glenn R. Smith
  • K. O’Brien
  • Phil Robertson (2)
  • Tad Campbell
  • Tom Christianson (2)

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.39% of network
(64)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.39%)
  • Bill Meikle (1.39%)
  • Glenn R. Smith (1.39%)
  • K. O'Brien (1.39%)
  • Miles Hill (1.39%)
  • Phil Robertson (2) (1.39%)
  • Tad Campbell (1.39%)
  • Tom Christianson (2) (1.39%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Idle Eyes 88.89%
Influence Score
i
11.11% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Idle Eyes (11.11%)
  • Bill Meikle (11.11%)
  • Glenn R. Smith (11.11%)
  • K. O'Brien (11.11%)
  • Miles Hill (11.11%)
  • Phil Robertson (2) (11.11%)
  • Tad Campbell (11.11%)
  • Tom Christianson (2) (11.11%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 64 [Idle Eyes] *
                            1 [Bill Meikle] *
                            1 [Glenn R. Smith] *
                            1 [K. O'Brien] *
                            1 [Miles Hill] *
                            1 [Phil Robertson (2)] *
                            1 [Tad Campbell] *
                            1 [Tom Christianson (2)]
                           )
                         = 64

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Idle Eyes] *
                            1 [Bill Meikle] *
                            1 [Glenn R. Smith] *
                            1 [K. O'Brien] *
                            1 [Miles Hill] *
                            1 [Phil Robertson (2)] *
                            1 [Tad Campbell] *
                            1 [Tom Christianson (2)]
                           )
                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.39% (64 overall)
  • This Post (1.39%)
  • Bill Meikle (1.39%)
  • Glenn R. Smith (1.39%)
  • K. O'Brien (1.39%)
  • Miles Hill (1.39%)
  • Phil Robertson (2) (1.39%)
  • Tad Campbell (1.39%)
  • Tom Christianson (2) (1.39%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Idle Eyes 88.89%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.11% (1 overall)
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Idle Eyes (11.11%)
  • Bill Meikle (11.11%)
  • Glenn R. Smith (11.11%)
  • K. O'Brien (11.11%)
  • Miles Hill (11.11%)
  • Phil Robertson (2) (11.11%)
  • Tad Campbell (11.11%)
  • Tom Christianson (2) (11.11%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Idle Eyes ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Bill Meikle ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Glenn R. Smith ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
K. O'Brien ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Miles Hill ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Phil Robertson (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tad Campbell ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tom Christianson (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Tom Christianson (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tad Campbell ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Phil Robertson (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Miles Hill ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
K. O'Brien ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Glenn R. Smith ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Bill Meikle ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Idle Eyes ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Idle Eyes
Inbound Posts (1)
Idle Eyes
Last calculated: Jun 9, 12:17 PM
5

Related Content

Figures

  • Bill Meikle