Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

C.J. PierceDave Williams (6)Jasen MorenoStevie BentonJason Jones (5)Ryan McCombsChristian Joseph PierceMike Luce

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 6 days ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Drowning Pool

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Musicians

  • C.J. Pierce
  • Christian Joseph Pierce
  • Dave Williams (6)
  • Jasen Moreno
  • Jason Jones (5)
  • Mike Luce
  • Ryan McCombs
  • Stevie Benton

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
88.89% of network
(64)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (88.89%)
  • C.J. Pierce (1.39%)
  • Jasen Moreno (1.39%)
  • Mike Luce (1.39%)
  • Stevie Benton (1.39%)
  • Christian Joseph Pierce (1.39%)
  • Dave Williams (6) (1.39%)
  • Jason Jones (5) (1.39%)
  • Ryan McCombs (1.39%)
Influence Score
i
11.11% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • C.J. Pierce (11.11%)
  • Jasen Moreno (11.11%)
  • Mike Luce (11.11%)
  • Stevie Benton (11.11%)
  • Christian Joseph Pierce (11.11%)
  • Dave Williams (6) (11.11%)
  • Jason Jones (5) (11.11%)
  • Ryan McCombs (11.11%)
Direct Connections 16

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 8) = 8
$outbound = max(1, 8) = 8

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 8 * 8 = 64
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 8 / 8 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 64 *
                           ( 1 [C.J. Pierce] *
                            1 [Jasen Moreno] *
                            1 [Mike Luce] *
                            1 [Stevie Benton] *
                            1 [Christian Joseph Pierce] *
                            1 [Dave Williams (6)] *
                            1 [Jason Jones (5)] *
                            1 [Ryan McCombs]
                           )

                         = 64

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [C.J. Pierce] *
                            1 [Jasen Moreno] *
                            1 [Mike Luce] *
                            1 [Stevie Benton] *
                            1 [Christian Joseph Pierce] *
                            1 [Dave Williams (6)] *
                            1 [Jason Jones (5)] *
                            1 [Ryan McCombs]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 8 Tags on post
Inbound 8 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 64
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
88.89% (64 overall)
  • This Post (88.89%)
  • C.J. Pierce (1.39%)
  • Jasen Moreno (1.39%)
  • Mike Luce (1.39%)
  • Stevie Benton (1.39%)
  • Christian Joseph Pierce (1.39%)
  • Dave Williams (6) (1.39%)
  • Jason Jones (5) (1.39%)
  • Ryan McCombs (1.39%)
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.11% (1 overall)
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • C.J. Pierce (11.11%)
  • Jasen Moreno (11.11%)
  • Mike Luce (11.11%)
  • Stevie Benton (11.11%)
  • Christian Joseph Pierce (11.11%)
  • Dave Williams (6) (11.11%)
  • Jason Jones (5) (11.11%)
  • Ryan McCombs (11.11%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
C.J. Pierce ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jasen Moreno ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mike Luce ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Stevie Benton ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Christian Joseph Pierce ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Dave Williams (6) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jason Jones (5) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ryan McCombs ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Ryan McCombs ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jason Jones (5) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Dave Williams (6) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Christian Joseph Pierce ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Stevie Benton ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mike Luce ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jasen Moreno ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
C.J. Pierce ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (8)
C.J. Pierce
Christian Joseph Pierce
Dave Williams (6)
Jasen Moreno
Jason Jones (5)
Mike Luce
Ryan McCombs
Stevie Benton
Inbound Posts (8)
C.J. Pierce
Jasen Moreno
Mike Luce
Stevie Benton
Christian Joseph Pierce
Dave Williams (6)
Jason Jones (5)
Ryan McCombs
Last calculated: Jun 12, 8:23 PM
19

Related Content

No related content found.