Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

The Byrds
David Crosby
The BeefeatersLes Baxter’s BalladeersCrosby and NashCPRThe Jet Set (2)Crosby & NashThe Red HotsNash & Young

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 1 week ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

David Crosby & Friends

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • CPR
  • Crosby & Nash
  • Crosby and Nash
  • Les Baxter’s Balladeers
  • Nash & Young
  • Stills & Nash
  • The Beefeaters
  • The Byrds
    The Byrds band photo
  • The Jet Set (2)
  • The Red Hots

Connected Musicians

  • David Crosby
    David Crosby band photo

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.12% of network
(504.98T)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.12%)
  • David Crosby (13.97%)
  • Les Baxter's Balladeers (7.39%)
  • The Red Hots (5.66%)
  • Stills & Nash (1.85%)
  • Nash & Young (1.85%)
  • Crosby & Nash (0.46%)
  • Crosby and Nash (0.46%)
  • The Jet Set (2) (0.46%)
  • CPR (0.12%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
The Byrds 41.69%The Beefeaters 25.98%
Influence Score
i
8.33% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (8.33%)
  • Crosby & Nash (8.33%)
  • The Byrds (8.33%)
  • The Beefeaters (8.33%)
  • Crosby and Nash (8.33%)
  • David Crosby (8.33%)
  • The Red Hots (8.33%)
  • The Jet Set (2) (8.33%)
  • CPR (8.33%)
  • Les Baxter's Balladeers (8.33%)
  • Stills & Nash (8.33%)
  • Nash & Young (8.33%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 11 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 4 [Crosby & Nash] *
                            361 [The Byrds] *
                            225 [The Beefeaters] *
                            4 [Crosby and Nash] *
                            121 [David Crosby] *
                            49 [The Red Hots] *
                            4 [The Jet Set (2)] *
                            1 [CPR] *
                            64 [Les Baxter's Balladeers] *
                            16 [Stills & Nash] *
                            16 [Nash & Young]
                           )

                         = 504.98T

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Crosby & Nash] *
                            1 [The Byrds] *
                            1 [The Beefeaters] *
                            1 [Crosby and Nash] *
                            1 [David Crosby] *
                            1 [The Red Hots] *
                            1 [The Jet Set (2)] *
                            1 [CPR] *
                            1 [Les Baxter's Balladeers] *
                            1 [Stills & Nash] *
                            1 [Nash & Young]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 11 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.12% (504.98T overall)
  • This Post (0.12%)
  • David Crosby (13.97%)
  • Les Baxter's Balladeers (7.39%)
  • The Red Hots (5.66%)
  • Stills & Nash (1.85%)
  • Nash & Young (1.85%)
  • Crosby & Nash (0.46%)
  • Crosby and Nash (0.46%)
  • The Jet Set (2) (0.46%)
  • CPR (0.12%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
The Byrds 41.69%The Beefeaters 25.98%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
8.33% (1 overall)
  • This Post (8.33%)
  • Crosby & Nash (8.33%)
  • The Byrds (8.33%)
  • The Beefeaters (8.33%)
  • Crosby and Nash (8.33%)
  • David Crosby (8.33%)
  • The Red Hots (8.33%)
  • The Jet Set (2) (8.33%)
  • CPR (8.33%)
  • Les Baxter's Balladeers (8.33%)
  • Stills & Nash (8.33%)
  • Nash & Young (8.33%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Crosby & Nash ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
The Byrds ↗
Str: 361Inf: 1
The Beefeaters ↗
Str: 225Inf: 1
Crosby and Nash ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
David Crosby ↗
Str: 121Inf: 1
The Red Hots ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
The Jet Set (2) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
CPR ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Les Baxter's Balladeers ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Stills & Nash ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Nash & Young ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Nash & Young ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Stills & Nash ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Les Baxter's Balladeers ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
CPR ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
The Jet Set (2) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
The Red Hots ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
David Crosby ↗
Str: 121Inf: 1
Crosby and Nash ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
The Beefeaters ↗
Str: 225Inf: 1
The Byrds ↗
Str: 361Inf: 1
Crosby & Nash ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
David Crosby
Inbound Posts (1)
David Crosby
Last calculated: Jun 15, 5:49 PM
28

Related Content

No related content found.