Network Profile
Overall Strength
8.59%
of network
(4.51 × 1016)
Influence Score
7.69%
of network
(1.004438)
Direct Connections
16
Node & Network Strength Details
How is this calculated? The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the website.
Every tag forms a network link. The pie charts below show each connected post's base strength (PV) and influence (IV) as a share of this post's direct neighbourhood.
// 1. Base variables (minimum value of 1 to prevent zero-multiplication issues)
Outbound ($in) = max(1, 8) =
8
Inbound ($out) = max(1, 8) =
8
// 2. Node Base Values
Base Strength (PV) = $in × $out = 8 × 8 =
64
Base Influence (IV) = $in ÷ $out = 8 ÷ 8 =
1
// 3. Network Exponential Values (accumulating 12 direct neighbours)
Network Strength (CV) = Node PV × (Π Neighbour PVs) =
4.51 × 1016
Network Influence (TV) = Node IV × (Π Neighbour IVs) =
1.004438
Outbound
8
Tags on post
Inbound
8
Posts tagging this
Base Node Strength
64
Base Node Influence
1
Connected Nodes
12
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
8.59%
(4.51 × 1016 overall)
- This Post (8.59%)
- Sarke (16.24%)
- Eibon (6.58%)
- Ted Skjellum (2.15%)
- Gylve Nagell (2.15%)
- Fenriz (1.21%)
- Isengard (0.54%)
- Nocturno Culto (0.54%)
- Anders Risberget (0.54%)
- Dag Nilsen (0.54%)
- Ivar Enger (0.54%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)Satyricon 32.21%Dødheimsgard 28.19%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
- This Post (7.69%)
- Dødheimsgard (8.24%)
- Isengard (7.69%)
- Eibon (7.69%)
- Sarke (7.69%)
- Fenriz (7.69%)
- Nocturno Culto (7.69%)
- Ted Skjellum (7.69%)
- Anders Risberget (7.69%)
- Dag Nilsen (7.69%)
- Gylve Nagell (7.69%)
- Ivar Enger (7.69%)
- Satyricon (7.21%)
Connected Network (How neighbours affect this node)
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)
Last calculated math cycle: May 5, 4:20 AM
Analyzing Network Connections...
👁️ 54 Views
Related Content
No related content found.
