Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Uncle Tupelo
Courtesy MoveSwag (4)Ken CoomerDutch (22)Buzzkill (2)CyodClockhammer

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

jacierlogyn
Last login: 5 hours ago
Comments: 0

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 1 day ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Civic Duty (3)

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Buzzkill (2)
  • Clockhammer
  • Courtesy Move
  • Cyod
  • Dutch (22)
  • Swag (4)
  • Uncle Tupelo
    Uncle Tupelo band photo

Connected Musicians

  • Ken Coomer

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.85% of network
(82.9K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.85%)
  • Courtesy Move (7.63%)
  • Swag (4) (3.39%)
  • Buzzkill (2) (0.85%)
  • Clockhammer (0.85%)
  • Cyod (0.85%)
  • Dutch (22) (0.85%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Ken Coomer 54.24%Uncle Tupelo 30.51%
Influence Score
i
11.11% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Uncle Tupelo (11.11%)
  • Ken Coomer (11.11%)
  • Courtesy Move (11.11%)
  • Buzzkill (2) (11.11%)
  • Clockhammer (11.11%)
  • Cyod (11.11%)
  • Swag (4) (11.11%)
  • Dutch (22) (11.11%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 36 [Uncle Tupelo] *
                            64 [Ken Coomer] *
                            9 [Courtesy Move] *
                            1 [Buzzkill (2)] *
                            1 [Clockhammer] *
                            1 [Cyod] *
                            4 [Swag (4)] *
                            1 [Dutch (22)]
                           )

                         = 82.9K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Uncle Tupelo] *
                            1 [Ken Coomer] *
                            1 [Courtesy Move] *
                            1 [Buzzkill (2)] *
                            1 [Clockhammer] *
                            1 [Cyod] *
                            1 [Swag (4)] *
                            1 [Dutch (22)]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.85% (82.9K overall)
  • This Post (0.85%)
  • Courtesy Move (7.63%)
  • Swag (4) (3.39%)
  • Buzzkill (2) (0.85%)
  • Clockhammer (0.85%)
  • Cyod (0.85%)
  • Dutch (22) (0.85%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Ken Coomer 54.24%Uncle Tupelo 30.51%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.11% (1 overall)
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Uncle Tupelo (11.11%)
  • Ken Coomer (11.11%)
  • Courtesy Move (11.11%)
  • Buzzkill (2) (11.11%)
  • Clockhammer (11.11%)
  • Cyod (11.11%)
  • Swag (4) (11.11%)
  • Dutch (22) (11.11%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Uncle Tupelo ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Ken Coomer ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Courtesy Move ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Buzzkill (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Clockhammer ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Cyod ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Swag (4) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Dutch (22) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Dutch (22) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Swag (4) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Cyod ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Clockhammer ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Buzzkill (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Courtesy Move ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Ken Coomer ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Uncle Tupelo ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Ken Coomer
Inbound Posts (1)
Ken Coomer
Last calculated: Jun 29, 10:09 AM
26

Related Content

No related content found.