Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Atomic Rooster
John Goodsall
BRAND XBrand X (3)Brand X IIFIRE MERCHANTSSandoz (4)

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 5 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Babylon (6)

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Atomic Rooster
    Atomic Rooster band photo
  • BRAND X
  • Brand X (3)
  • Brand X II
  • FIRE MERCHANTS
  • Sandoz (4)

Connected Musicians

  • John Goodsall
    John Goodsall band photo

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.11% of network
(749.12M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.11%)
  • John Goodsall (5.45%)
  • Brand X (3) (2.78%)
  • Brand X II (0.44%)
  • FIRE MERCHANTS (0.11%)
  • Sandoz (4) (0.11%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Atomic Rooster 58.84%BRAND X 32.15%
Influence Score
i
12.50% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Atomic Rooster (12.50%)
  • BRAND X (12.50%)
  • John Goodsall (12.50%)
  • Brand X (3) (12.50%)
  • Brand X II (12.50%)
  • FIRE MERCHANTS (12.50%)
  • Sandoz (4) (12.50%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 7 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 529 [Atomic Rooster] *
                            289 [BRAND X] *
                            49 [John Goodsall] *
                            25 [Brand X (3)] *
                            4 [Brand X II] *
                            1 [FIRE MERCHANTS] *
                            1 [Sandoz (4)]
                           )

                         = 749.12M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Atomic Rooster] *
                            1 [BRAND X] *
                            1 [John Goodsall] *
                            1 [Brand X (3)] *
                            1 [Brand X II] *
                            1 [FIRE MERCHANTS] *
                            1 [Sandoz (4)]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 7 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.11% (749.12M overall)
  • This Post (0.11%)
  • John Goodsall (5.45%)
  • Brand X (3) (2.78%)
  • Brand X II (0.44%)
  • FIRE MERCHANTS (0.11%)
  • Sandoz (4) (0.11%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Atomic Rooster 58.84%BRAND X 32.15%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
12.50% (1 overall)
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Atomic Rooster (12.50%)
  • BRAND X (12.50%)
  • John Goodsall (12.50%)
  • Brand X (3) (12.50%)
  • Brand X II (12.50%)
  • FIRE MERCHANTS (12.50%)
  • Sandoz (4) (12.50%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Atomic Rooster ↗
Str: 529Inf: 1
BRAND X ↗
Str: 289Inf: 1
John Goodsall ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Brand X (3) ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Brand X II ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
FIRE MERCHANTS ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Sandoz (4) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Sandoz (4) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
FIRE MERCHANTS ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Brand X II ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Brand X (3) ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
John Goodsall ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
BRAND X ↗
Str: 289Inf: 1
Atomic Rooster ↗
Str: 529Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
John Goodsall
Inbound Posts (1)
John Goodsall
Last calculated: Jun 20, 7:26 AM
36

Related Content

No related content found.