Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

The Cecil Taylor Unit
David S. Ware
David S. Ware String EnsembleAum FidelityDavid S. Ware QuartetAndrew Cyrille & MaonoDavid S. Ware TrioDavid S. Ware & Matthew Shipp Duo

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 12 hours ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 4 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Ahmed Abdullah And The Solomonic Quintet

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Andrew Cyrille & Maono
  • Aum Fidelity
  • David S. Ware & Matthew Shipp Duo
  • David S. Ware Quartet
  • David S. Ware String Ensemble
  • David S. Ware Trio
  • The Cecil Taylor Unit

Connected Musicians

  • David S. Ware
    David S. Ware band photo

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.20% of network
(7.97B)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.20%)
  • David S. Ware (12.57%)
  • Aum Fidelity (3.93%)
  • David S. Ware Quartet (3.14%)
  • David S. Ware String Ensemble (3.14%)
  • David S. Ware Trio (0.79%)
  • Andrew Cyrille & Maono (0.79%)
  • David S. Ware & Matthew Shipp Duo (0.79%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
The Cecil Taylor Unit 74.66%
Influence Score
i
11.30% of network
(0.8421)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.30%)
  • The Cecil Taylor Unit (11.89%)
  • David S. Ware (11.30%)
  • David S. Ware Quartet (11.30%)
  • David S. Ware String Ensemble (11.30%)
  • David S. Ware Trio (11.30%)
  • Andrew Cyrille & Maono (11.30%)
  • David S. Ware & Matthew Shipp Duo (11.30%)
  • Aum Fidelity (9.04%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 380 [The Cecil Taylor Unit] *
                            64 [David S. Ware] *
                            16 [David S. Ware Quartet] *
                            16 [David S. Ware String Ensemble] *
                            4 [David S. Ware Trio] *
                            4 [Andrew Cyrille & Maono] *
                            4 [David S. Ware & Matthew Shipp Duo] *
                            20 [Aum Fidelity]
                           )

                         = 7.97B

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.05 [The Cecil Taylor Unit] *
                            1 [David S. Ware] *
                            1 [David S. Ware Quartet] *
                            1 [David S. Ware String Ensemble] *
                            1 [David S. Ware Trio] *
                            1 [Andrew Cyrille & Maono] *
                            1 [David S. Ware & Matthew Shipp Duo] *
                            0.8 [Aum Fidelity]
                           )

                         = 0.8421
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.20% (7.97B overall)
  • This Post (0.20%)
  • David S. Ware (12.57%)
  • Aum Fidelity (3.93%)
  • David S. Ware Quartet (3.14%)
  • David S. Ware String Ensemble (3.14%)
  • David S. Ware Trio (0.79%)
  • Andrew Cyrille & Maono (0.79%)
  • David S. Ware & Matthew Shipp Duo (0.79%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
The Cecil Taylor Unit 74.66%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.30% (0.8421 overall)
  • This Post (11.30%)
  • The Cecil Taylor Unit (11.89%)
  • David S. Ware (11.30%)
  • David S. Ware Quartet (11.30%)
  • David S. Ware String Ensemble (11.30%)
  • David S. Ware Trio (11.30%)
  • Andrew Cyrille & Maono (11.30%)
  • David S. Ware & Matthew Shipp Duo (11.30%)
  • Aum Fidelity (9.04%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
The Cecil Taylor Unit ↗
Str: 380Inf: 1.05
David S. Ware ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
David S. Ware Quartet ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
David S. Ware String Ensemble ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
David S. Ware Trio ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Andrew Cyrille & Maono ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
David S. Ware & Matthew Shipp Duo ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Aum Fidelity ↗
Str: 20Inf: 0.8
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Aum Fidelity ↗
Str: 20Inf: 0.8
David S. Ware & Matthew Shipp Duo ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Andrew Cyrille & Maono ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
David S. Ware Trio ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
David S. Ware String Ensemble ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
David S. Ware Quartet ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
David S. Ware ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
The Cecil Taylor Unit ↗
Str: 380Inf: 1.05

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
David S. Ware
Inbound Posts (1)
David S. Ware
Last calculated: Jul 3, 7:48 AM
37

Related Content

No related content found.