Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Electric FrankensteinJim Foster (4)Bruce WingateKeith HartelDave Scott (4)Paul RichardJack Steeples

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 10 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Adrenalin O.D.

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Electric Frankenstein

Connected Musicians

  • Bruce Wingate
  • Dave Scott (4)
  • Jack Steeples
  • Jim Foster (4)
  • Keith Hartel
  • Paul Richard

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
8.87% of network
(52K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (8.87%)
  • Jim Foster (4) (0.99%)
  • Bruce Wingate (0.25%)
  • Jack Steeples (0.25%)
  • Keith Hartel (0.25%)
  • Paul Richard (0.25%)
  • Dave Scott (4) (0.25%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Electric Frankenstein 88.92%
Influence Score
i
12.50% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Jim Foster (4) (12.50%)
  • Bruce Wingate (12.50%)
  • Jack Steeples (12.50%)
  • Keith Hartel (12.50%)
  • Paul Richard (12.50%)
  • Dave Scott (4) (12.50%)
  • Electric Frankenstein (12.50%)
Direct Connections 12

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 6) = 6
$outbound = max(1, 6) = 6

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 6 * 6 = 36
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 6 / 6 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 7 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 36 *
                           ( 4 [Jim Foster (4)] *
                            1 [Bruce Wingate] *
                            1 [Jack Steeples] *
                            1 [Keith Hartel] *
                            1 [Paul Richard] *
                            1 [Dave Scott (4)] *
                            361 [Electric Frankenstein]
                           )

                         = 52K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Jim Foster (4)] *
                            1 [Bruce Wingate] *
                            1 [Jack Steeples] *
                            1 [Keith Hartel] *
                            1 [Paul Richard] *
                            1 [Dave Scott (4)] *
                            1 [Electric Frankenstein]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 6 Tags on post
Inbound 6 Posts tagging this
Connections 7 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 36
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
8.87% (52K overall)
  • This Post (8.87%)
  • Jim Foster (4) (0.99%)
  • Bruce Wingate (0.25%)
  • Jack Steeples (0.25%)
  • Keith Hartel (0.25%)
  • Paul Richard (0.25%)
  • Dave Scott (4) (0.25%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Electric Frankenstein 88.92%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
12.50% (1 overall)
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Jim Foster (4) (12.50%)
  • Bruce Wingate (12.50%)
  • Jack Steeples (12.50%)
  • Keith Hartel (12.50%)
  • Paul Richard (12.50%)
  • Dave Scott (4) (12.50%)
  • Electric Frankenstein (12.50%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Jim Foster (4) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Bruce Wingate ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jack Steeples ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Keith Hartel ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Paul Richard ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Dave Scott (4) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Electric Frankenstein ↗
Str: 361Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Electric Frankenstein ↗
Str: 361Inf: 1
Dave Scott (4) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Paul Richard ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Keith Hartel ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jack Steeples ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Bruce Wingate ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jim Foster (4) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (6)
Bruce Wingate
Dave Scott (4)
Jack Steeples
Jim Foster (4)
Keith Hartel
Paul Richard
Inbound Posts (6)
Jim Foster (4)
Bruce Wingate
Jack Steeples
Keith Hartel
Paul Richard
Dave Scott (4)
Last calculated: Jun 22, 2:06 AM
24

Related Content

No related content found.