Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Karen DervanMATTHEW NOLANLaurence MackinJames MackinRichard McCullough (2)ABIGAIL SMITHLioba PetrieCameron Doyle (2)

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 4 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

3EPKANO

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Musicians

  • ABIGAIL SMITH
  • Cameron Doyle (2)
  • James Mackin
  • Karen Dervan
  • Laurence Mackin
  • Lioba Petrie
  • MATTHEW NOLAN
  • Richard McCullough (2)

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
87.67% of network
(128)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (87.67%)
  • Laurence Mackin (2.74%)
  • ABIGAIL SMITH (1.37%)
  • MATTHEW NOLAN (1.37%)
  • Cameron Doyle (2) (1.37%)
  • James Mackin (1.37%)
  • Karen Dervan (1.37%)
  • Lioba Petrie (1.37%)
  • Richard McCullough (2) (1.37%)
Influence Score
i
10.00% of network
(2)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • Laurence Mackin (20.00%)
  • ABIGAIL SMITH (10.00%)
  • MATTHEW NOLAN (10.00%)
  • Cameron Doyle (2) (10.00%)
  • James Mackin (10.00%)
  • Karen Dervan (10.00%)
  • Lioba Petrie (10.00%)
  • Richard McCullough (2) (10.00%)
Direct Connections 16

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 8) = 8
$outbound = max(1, 8) = 8

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 8 * 8 = 64
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 8 / 8 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 64 *
                           ( 2 [Laurence Mackin] *
                            1 [ABIGAIL SMITH] *
                            1 [MATTHEW NOLAN] *
                            1 [Cameron Doyle (2)] *
                            1 [James Mackin] *
                            1 [Karen Dervan] *
                            1 [Lioba Petrie] *
                            1 [Richard McCullough (2)]
                           )

                         = 128

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 2 [Laurence Mackin] *
                            1 [ABIGAIL SMITH] *
                            1 [MATTHEW NOLAN] *
                            1 [Cameron Doyle (2)] *
                            1 [James Mackin] *
                            1 [Karen Dervan] *
                            1 [Lioba Petrie] *
                            1 [Richard McCullough (2)]
                           )

                         = 2
Outbound 8 Tags on post
Inbound 8 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 64
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
87.67% (128 overall)
  • This Post (87.67%)
  • Laurence Mackin (2.74%)
  • ABIGAIL SMITH (1.37%)
  • MATTHEW NOLAN (1.37%)
  • Cameron Doyle (2) (1.37%)
  • James Mackin (1.37%)
  • Karen Dervan (1.37%)
  • Lioba Petrie (1.37%)
  • Richard McCullough (2) (1.37%)
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
10.00% (2 overall)
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • Laurence Mackin (20.00%)
  • ABIGAIL SMITH (10.00%)
  • MATTHEW NOLAN (10.00%)
  • Cameron Doyle (2) (10.00%)
  • James Mackin (10.00%)
  • Karen Dervan (10.00%)
  • Lioba Petrie (10.00%)
  • Richard McCullough (2) (10.00%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Laurence Mackin ↗
Str: 2Inf: 2
ABIGAIL SMITH ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
MATTHEW NOLAN ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Cameron Doyle (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
James Mackin ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Karen Dervan ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Lioba Petrie ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Richard McCullough (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Richard McCullough (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Lioba Petrie ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Karen Dervan ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
James Mackin ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Cameron Doyle (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
MATTHEW NOLAN ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
ABIGAIL SMITH ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Laurence Mackin ↗
Str: 2Inf: 2

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (8)
ABIGAIL SMITH
Cameron Doyle (2)
James Mackin
Karen Dervan
Laurence Mackin
Lioba Petrie
MATTHEW NOLAN
Richard McCullough (2)
Inbound Posts (8)
ABIGAIL SMITH
MATTHEW NOLAN
Laurence Mackin
Cameron Doyle (2)
James Mackin
Karen Dervan
Lioba Petrie
Richard McCullough (2)
Last calculated: Jun 19, 4:30 PM
27

Related Content

No related content found.