Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Olivia PouletEnzo Cilenti
Peter CapaldiHarry Hadden-PatonAnna ChlumskyJohnny PembertonIn the LoopTom HollanderDavid RascheLucinda Raikes

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 7 days ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Reid Sasser

Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook
Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Musicians

  • James Doherty

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.22% of network
(326.27B)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.22%)
  • James Gandolfini (5.61%)
  • Peter Capaldi (5.61%)
  • Tom Hollander (3.59%)
  • Zach Woods (3.59%)
  • Johnny Pemberton (2.02%)
  • Anna Chlumsky (0.90%)
  • Harry Hadden-Paton (0.90%)
  • James Doherty (0.22%)
  • David Rasche (0.22%)
  • Chris Addison (0.22%)
  • Gina McKee (0.22%)
  • Lucinda Raikes (0.22%)
  • Mimi Kennedy (0.22%)
  • Olivia Poulet (0.22%)
  • Samantha Harrington (0.22%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
In the Loop 64.80%Enzo Cilenti 10.99%
Influence Score
i
5.56% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (5.56%)
  • James Doherty (5.56%)
  • Anna Chlumsky (5.56%)
  • Enzo Cilenti (5.56%)
  • Johnny Pemberton (5.56%)
  • James Gandolfini (5.56%)
  • Peter Capaldi (5.56%)
  • David Rasche (5.56%)
  • Harry Hadden-Paton (5.56%)
  • Tom Hollander (5.56%)
  • In the Loop (5.56%)
  • Chris Addison (5.56%)
  • Gina McKee (5.56%)
  • Lucinda Raikes (5.56%)
  • Mimi Kennedy (5.56%)
  • Olivia Poulet (5.56%)
  • Zach Woods (5.56%)
  • Samantha Harrington (5.56%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 17 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [James Doherty] *
                            4 [Anna Chlumsky] *
                            49 [Enzo Cilenti] *
                            9 [Johnny Pemberton] *
                            25 [James Gandolfini] *
                            25 [Peter Capaldi] *
                            1 [David Rasche] *
                            4 [Harry Hadden-Paton] *
                            16 [Tom Hollander] *
                            289 [In the Loop] *
                            1 [Chris Addison] *
                            1 [Gina McKee] *
                            1 [Lucinda Raikes] *
                            1 [Mimi Kennedy] *
                            1 [Olivia Poulet] *
                            16 [Zach Woods] *
                            1 [Samantha Harrington]
                           )
                         = 326.27B

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [James Doherty] *
                            1 [Anna Chlumsky] *
                            1 [Enzo Cilenti] *
                            1 [Johnny Pemberton] *
                            1 [James Gandolfini] *
                            1 [Peter Capaldi] *
                            1 [David Rasche] *
                            1 [Harry Hadden-Paton] *
                            1 [Tom Hollander] *
                            1 [In the Loop] *
                            1 [Chris Addison] *
                            1 [Gina McKee] *
                            1 [Lucinda Raikes] *
                            1 [Mimi Kennedy] *
                            1 [Olivia Poulet] *
                            1 [Zach Woods] *
                            1 [Samantha Harrington]
                           )
                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 17 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.22% (326.27B overall)
  • This Post (0.22%)
  • James Gandolfini (5.61%)
  • Peter Capaldi (5.61%)
  • Tom Hollander (3.59%)
  • Zach Woods (3.59%)
  • Johnny Pemberton (2.02%)
  • Anna Chlumsky (0.90%)
  • Harry Hadden-Paton (0.90%)
  • James Doherty (0.22%)
  • David Rasche (0.22%)
  • Chris Addison (0.22%)
  • Gina McKee (0.22%)
  • Lucinda Raikes (0.22%)
  • Mimi Kennedy (0.22%)
  • Olivia Poulet (0.22%)
  • Samantha Harrington (0.22%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
In the Loop 64.80%Enzo Cilenti 10.99%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
5.56% (1 overall)
  • This Post (5.56%)
  • James Doherty (5.56%)
  • Anna Chlumsky (5.56%)
  • Enzo Cilenti (5.56%)
  • Johnny Pemberton (5.56%)
  • James Gandolfini (5.56%)
  • Peter Capaldi (5.56%)
  • David Rasche (5.56%)
  • Harry Hadden-Paton (5.56%)
  • Tom Hollander (5.56%)
  • In the Loop (5.56%)
  • Chris Addison (5.56%)
  • Gina McKee (5.56%)
  • Lucinda Raikes (5.56%)
  • Mimi Kennedy (5.56%)
  • Olivia Poulet (5.56%)
  • Zach Woods (5.56%)
  • Samantha Harrington (5.56%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
James Doherty ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Anna Chlumsky ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Enzo Cilenti ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Johnny Pemberton ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
James Gandolfini ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Peter Capaldi ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
David Rasche ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Harry Hadden-Paton ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Tom Hollander ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
In the Loop ↗
Str: 289Inf: 1
Chris Addison ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Gina McKee ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Lucinda Raikes ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mimi Kennedy ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Olivia Poulet ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Zach Woods ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Samantha Harrington ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Samantha Harrington ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Zach Woods ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Olivia Poulet ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mimi Kennedy ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Lucinda Raikes ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Gina McKee ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Chris Addison ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
In the Loop ↗
Str: 289Inf: 1
Tom Hollander ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Harry Hadden-Paton ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
David Rasche ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Peter Capaldi ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
James Gandolfini ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Johnny Pemberton ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Enzo Cilenti ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Anna Chlumsky ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
James Doherty ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
In the Loop
Inbound Posts (1)
In the Loop
Last calculated: Jun 8, 11:29 PM
25

Related Content

Actors

  • Johnny Pemberton
  • Gina McKee
  • James Gandolfini
  • Lucinda Raikes
  • Peter Capaldi
  • Mimi Kennedy
  • David Rasche
  • Olivia Poulet
  • Harry Hadden-Paton
  • Zach Woods
  • Tom Hollander
  • Samantha Harrington
  • Anna Chlumsky
  • Enzo Cilenti
  • Chris Addison

Films

  • In the Loop