How is this calculated?
The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.
// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 4) = 4
$outbound = max(1, 3) = 3
// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 4 * 3 = 12
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 4 / 3 = 1.3333
// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 25 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
= 12 *
( 15 [Ileen Getz] *
6 [Matt Malloy] *
4 [American fiction] *
25 [Miriam Shor] *
25 [Richard Gere] *
16 [Erik Per Sullivan] *
9 [Kate Burton] *
36 [Michelle Monaghan] *
4 [Margaret Colin] *
324 [Unfaithful] *
16 [Diane Lane] *
4 [Dominic Chianese] *
4 [Damon Gupton] *
16 [Chad Lowe] *
1 [Erich Anderson] *
1 [Hal Smith-Reynolds] *
1 [Larry Gleason] *
16 [Marc Forget] *
1 [George F. Miller] *
1 [Joseph Badalucco Jr.] *
1 [Olivier Martinez] *
1 [Paul D. Failla] *
4 [The Big Sick] *
25 [Kumail Nanjiani] *
3 [Changing Lanes]
)
= 3.57 x 10^20
Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
= 1.3333 *
( 1.67 [Ileen Getz] *
1.5 [Matt Malloy] *
1 [American fiction] *
1 [Miriam Shor] *
1 [Richard Gere] *
1 [Erik Per Sullivan] *
1 [Kate Burton] *
1 [Michelle Monaghan] *
1 [Margaret Colin] *
1 [Unfaithful] *
1 [Diane Lane] *
1 [Dominic Chianese] *
1 [Damon Gupton] *
1 [Chad Lowe] *
1 [Erich Anderson] *
1 [Hal Smith-Reynolds] *
1 [Larry Gleason] *
1 [Marc Forget] *
1 [George F. Miller] *
1 [Joseph Badalucco Jr.] *
1 [Olivier Martinez] *
1 [Paul D. Failla] *
1 [The Big Sick] *
1 [Kumail Nanjiani] *
0.3333 [Changing Lanes]
)
= 1.11
Outbound
4
Tags on post
Inbound
3
Posts tagging this
Connections
25
Total nodes
Base Node Strength
12
Base Node Influence
1.3333
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
2.10%
(3.57 × 1020 overall)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)Unfaithful 56.74%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
Connected Network Hierarchy
Sort list by:
Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)