How is this calculated?
The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.
// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 4) = 4
$outbound = max(1, 4) = 4
// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 4 * 4 = 16
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 4 / 4 = 1
// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 25 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
= 16 *
( 6 [14 February] *
9 [Megan Suri] *
9 [Valentine's Day] *
16 [Bedtime stories] *
16 [Debbie Lee Carrington] *
16 [Kathryn Joosten] *
16 [Annalise Basso] *
25 [Brandon Molale] *
4 [Tom Wright] *
289 [Granite Flats] *
1 [Annie Tedesco] *
1 [Cardiff Gerhardt] *
16 [Charlie Plummer] *
16 [David Naughton] *
1 [Ethan Ross Wills] *
1 [Jessica Wright] *
25 [Jim Turner] *
9 [Maia Guest] *
1 [Malia Tyler] *
1 [Mitchell Fink] *
1 [Peter Murnik] *
1 [Richard Gunn] *
1 [Scott Christopher] *
1 [Taryn O'Neill] *
1 [Captain Jake and the Never Land Pirates]
)
= 8.48 x 10^17
Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
= 1 *
( 1.5 [14 February] *
1 [Megan Suri] *
1 [Valentine's Day] *
1 [Bedtime stories] *
1 [Debbie Lee Carrington] *
1 [Kathryn Joosten] *
1 [Annalise Basso] *
1 [Brandon Molale] *
1 [Tom Wright] *
1 [Granite Flats] *
1 [Annie Tedesco] *
1 [Cardiff Gerhardt] *
1 [Charlie Plummer] *
1 [David Naughton] *
1 [Ethan Ross Wills] *
1 [Jessica Wright] *
1 [Jim Turner] *
1 [Maia Guest] *
1 [Malia Tyler] *
1 [Mitchell Fink] *
1 [Peter Murnik] *
1 [Richard Gunn] *
1 [Scott Christopher] *
1 [Taryn O'Neill] *
1 [Captain Jake and the Never Land Pirates]
)
= 1.5
Outbound
4
Tags on post
Inbound
4
Posts tagging this
Connections
25
Total nodes
Base Node Strength
16
Base Node Influence
1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
3.21%
(8.48 × 1017 overall)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)Granite Flats 57.92%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
Connected Network Hierarchy
Sort list by:
Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)