How is this calculated?
The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.
// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 4) = 4
$outbound = max(1, 4) = 4
// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 4 * 4 = 16
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 4 / 4 = 1
// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 25 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
= 16 *
( 9 [Patrick Horgan] *
16 [John Tormey] *
16 [Elizabeth Berkley] *
16 [The Curse of the Jade Scorpion] *
9 [Kyle Richards] *
4 [Down to Earth] *
16 [Ronnie Gilbert] *
36 [David Margulies] *
9 [Marcia Jean Kurtz] *
16 [River Phoenix] *
324 [Running on Empty] *
4 [Lynne Thigpen] *
4 [Judd Hirsch] *
16 [Augusta Dabney] *
25 [Bobo Lewis] *
16 [Christine Lahti] *
1 [Ed Crowley] *
1 [Jonas Abry] *
25 [Justine Johnston] *
16 [Leila Danette] *
4 [Martha Plimpton] *
1 [L.M. Kit Carson] *
9 [Sloane Shelton] *
1 [Steven Hill] *
1 [Maximum Risk]
)
= 8.41 x 10^23
Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
= 1 *
( 1 [Patrick Horgan] *
1 [John Tormey] *
1 [Elizabeth Berkley] *
1 [The Curse of the Jade Scorpion] *
1 [Kyle Richards] *
1 [Down to Earth] *
1 [Ronnie Gilbert] *
1 [David Margulies] *
1 [Marcia Jean Kurtz] *
1 [River Phoenix] *
1 [Running on Empty] *
1 [Lynne Thigpen] *
1 [Judd Hirsch] *
1 [Augusta Dabney] *
1 [Bobo Lewis] *
1 [Christine Lahti] *
1 [Ed Crowley] *
1 [Jonas Abry] *
1 [Justine Johnston] *
1 [Leila Danette] *
1 [Martha Plimpton] *
1 [L.M. Kit Carson] *
1 [Sloane Shelton] *
1 [Steven Hill] *
1 [Maximum Risk]
)
= 1
Outbound
4
Tags on post
Inbound
4
Posts tagging this
Connections
25
Total nodes
Base Node Strength
16
Base Node Influence
1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
2.62%
(8.41 × 1023 overall)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)Running on Empty 53.03%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
Connected Network Hierarchy
Sort list by:
Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)