How is this calculated?
The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.
// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 4) = 4
$outbound = max(1, 4) = 4
// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 4 * 4 = 16
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 4 / 4 = 1
// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 26 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
= 16 *
( 6 [Brian Markinson] *
12 [Lester Lanin] *
42 [Hugh Grant] *
16 [Geraldine Hughes] *
4 [GRAN TORINO] *
81 [Woody Allen] *
9 [Tracey Ullman] *
25 [Tony Darrow] *
16 [Jon Lovitz] *
361 [Small Time Crooks] *
1 [Carolyn Saxon] *
1 [Cindy Carver] *
1 [Crystal Field] *
1 [Diane Bradley] *
1 [Fanda Nikic] *
1 [Laurine Towler] *
1 [Lawrence Howard Levy] *
9 [Michael Rapaport] *
1 [Olivia Hayman] *
1 [Ray Garvey] *
16 [Sam Josepher] *
16 [Faye Wong] *
16 [Get Carter] *
9 [John Osborne] *
16 [Britt Ekland] *
1 [A Very Long Engagement]
)
= 1.73 x 10^21
Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
= 1 *
( 1.5 [Brian Markinson] *
1.33 [Lester Lanin] *
1.17 [Hugh Grant] *
1 [Geraldine Hughes] *
1 [GRAN TORINO] *
1 [Woody Allen] *
1 [Tracey Ullman] *
1 [Tony Darrow] *
1 [Jon Lovitz] *
1 [Small Time Crooks] *
1 [Carolyn Saxon] *
1 [Cindy Carver] *
1 [Crystal Field] *
1 [Diane Bradley] *
1 [Fanda Nikic] *
1 [Laurine Towler] *
1 [Lawrence Howard Levy] *
1 [Michael Rapaport] *
1 [Olivia Hayman] *
1 [Ray Garvey] *
1 [Sam Josepher] *
1 [Faye Wong] *
1 [Get Carter] *
1 [John Osborne] *
1 [Britt Ekland] *
1 [A Very Long Engagement]
)
= 2.33
Outbound
4
Tags on post
Inbound
4
Posts tagging this
Connections
26
Total nodes
Base Node Strength
16
Base Node Influence
1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
2.35%
(1.73 × 1021 overall)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)Small Time Crooks 53.09%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
Connected Network Hierarchy
Sort list by:
Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)