Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Elvis Costello
Brodsky Quartet
Andrew HaveronJacqueline ThomasIan Belton (2)Michael Thomas (5)Paul Cassidy

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 3 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Daniel Rowland (2)

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Brodsky Quartet
    Brodsky Quartet band photo

Connected Musicians

  • Andrew Haveron
  • Elvis Costello
    Elvis Costello band photo
  • Ian Belton (2)
  • Jacqueline Thomas
  • Michael Thomas (5)
  • Paul Cassidy

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.10% of network
(1.8K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.10%)
  • Andrew Haveron (1.10%)
  • Ian Belton (2) (1.10%)
  • Jacqueline Thomas (1.10%)
  • Michael Thomas (5) (1.10%)
  • Paul Cassidy (1.10%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Brodsky Quartet 53.85%Elvis Costello 39.56%
Influence Score
i
12.50% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Brodsky Quartet (12.50%)
  • Elvis Costello (12.50%)
  • Andrew Haveron (12.50%)
  • Ian Belton (2) (12.50%)
  • Jacqueline Thomas (12.50%)
  • Michael Thomas (5) (12.50%)
  • Paul Cassidy (12.50%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 7 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 49 [Brodsky Quartet] *
                            36 [Elvis Costello] *
                            1 [Andrew Haveron] *
                            1 [Ian Belton (2)] *
                            1 [Jacqueline Thomas] *
                            1 [Michael Thomas (5)] *
                            1 [Paul Cassidy]
                           )

                         = 1.8K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Brodsky Quartet] *
                            1 [Elvis Costello] *
                            1 [Andrew Haveron] *
                            1 [Ian Belton (2)] *
                            1 [Jacqueline Thomas] *
                            1 [Michael Thomas (5)] *
                            1 [Paul Cassidy]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 7 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.10% (1.8K overall)
  • This Post (1.10%)
  • Andrew Haveron (1.10%)
  • Ian Belton (2) (1.10%)
  • Jacqueline Thomas (1.10%)
  • Michael Thomas (5) (1.10%)
  • Paul Cassidy (1.10%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Brodsky Quartet 53.85%Elvis Costello 39.56%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
12.50% (1 overall)
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Brodsky Quartet (12.50%)
  • Elvis Costello (12.50%)
  • Andrew Haveron (12.50%)
  • Ian Belton (2) (12.50%)
  • Jacqueline Thomas (12.50%)
  • Michael Thomas (5) (12.50%)
  • Paul Cassidy (12.50%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Brodsky Quartet ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Elvis Costello ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Andrew Haveron ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ian Belton (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jacqueline Thomas ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Michael Thomas (5) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Paul Cassidy ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Paul Cassidy ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Michael Thomas (5) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jacqueline Thomas ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ian Belton (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Andrew Haveron ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Elvis Costello ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Brodsky Quartet ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Brodsky Quartet
Inbound Posts (1)
Brodsky Quartet
Last calculated: Jun 25, 8:08 PM
23

Related Content

No related content found.