Skip to content

Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Manfred Mann
McGuinness FlintTom McGuinnessHughie FlintJohn Mayall & the BluesbreakersLyle McGuinness BandStonebridge McGuinnessThe ManfredsChanter (2)

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Francesca Ladybird
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Matthew Leech
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 1

Jessica
Last login: 3 months ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 3 months ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 3 months ago
Comments: 0

The Blues Band

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Chanter (2)
  • John Mayall & the Bluesbreakers
  • Lyle McGuinness Band
  • Manfred Mann
  • McGuinness Flint
  • Stonebridge McGuinness
  • The Manfreds

Connected Musicians

  • Hughie Flint
  • Tom McGuinness

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.66% of network
(77.08B)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.66%)
  • Manfred Mann (32.45%)
  • McGuinness Flint (6.95%)
  • Tom McGuinness (5.96%)
  • Hughie Flint (4.14%)
  • Lyle McGuinness Band (1.49%)
  • Chanter (2) (0.17%)
  • Stonebridge McGuinness (0.17%)
  • The Manfreds (0.17%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
John Mayall & the Bluesbreakers 47.85%
Influence Score
i
9.84% of network
(1.17)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (9.84%)
  • McGuinness Flint (11.48%)
  • John Mayall & the Bluesbreakers (9.84%)
  • Hughie Flint (9.84%)
  • Chanter (2) (9.84%)
  • Lyle McGuinness Band (9.84%)
  • Manfred Mann (9.84%)
  • Tom McGuinness (9.84%)
  • Stonebridge McGuinness (9.84%)
  • The Manfreds (9.84%)
Direct Connections 4

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 2) = 2
$outbound = max(1, 2) = 2

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 2 * 2 = 4
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 2 / 2 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 9 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 4 *
                           ( 42 [McGuinness Flint] *
                            289 [John Mayall & the Bluesbreakers] *
                            25 [Hughie Flint] *
                            1 [Chanter (2)] *
                            9 [Lyle McGuinness Band] *
                            196 [Manfred Mann] *
                            36 [Tom McGuinness] *
                            1 [Stonebridge McGuinness] *
                            1 [The Manfreds]
                           )

                         = 77.08B

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.17 [McGuinness Flint] *
                            1 [John Mayall & the Bluesbreakers] *
                            1 [Hughie Flint] *
                            1 [Chanter (2)] *
                            1 [Lyle McGuinness Band] *
                            1 [Manfred Mann] *
                            1 [Tom McGuinness] *
                            1 [Stonebridge McGuinness] *
                            1 [The Manfreds]
                           )

                         = 1.17
Outbound 2 Tags on post
Inbound 2 Posts tagging this
Connections 9 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 4
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.66% (77.08B overall)
  • This Post (0.66%)
  • Manfred Mann (32.45%)
  • McGuinness Flint (6.95%)
  • Tom McGuinness (5.96%)
  • Hughie Flint (4.14%)
  • Lyle McGuinness Band (1.49%)
  • Chanter (2) (0.17%)
  • Stonebridge McGuinness (0.17%)
  • The Manfreds (0.17%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
John Mayall & the Bluesbreakers 47.85%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
9.84% (1.17 overall)
  • This Post (9.84%)
  • McGuinness Flint (11.48%)
  • John Mayall & the Bluesbreakers (9.84%)
  • Hughie Flint (9.84%)
  • Chanter (2) (9.84%)
  • Lyle McGuinness Band (9.84%)
  • Manfred Mann (9.84%)
  • Tom McGuinness (9.84%)
  • Stonebridge McGuinness (9.84%)
  • The Manfreds (9.84%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
McGuinness Flint ↗
Str: 42Inf: 1.17
John Mayall & the Bluesbreakers ↗
Str: 289Inf: 1
Hughie Flint ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Chanter (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Lyle McGuinness Band ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Manfred Mann ↗
Str: 196Inf: 1
Tom McGuinness ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Stonebridge McGuinness ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
The Manfreds ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
The Manfreds ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Stonebridge McGuinness ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tom McGuinness ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Manfred Mann ↗
Str: 196Inf: 1
Lyle McGuinness Band ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Chanter (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Hughie Flint ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
John Mayall & the Bluesbreakers ↗
Str: 289Inf: 1
McGuinness Flint ↗
Str: 42Inf: 1.17

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (2)
Hughie Flint
Tom McGuinness
Inbound Posts (2)
Hughie Flint
Tom McGuinness
Last calculated: Oct 18, 11:12 PM
25

Related Content

No related content found.

A Muso community