Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Peter Niblock
Robin McAuley
Fresh Boogie Band
James MeredithEddie HillColin BellRaymond CarrollCity SoundHugh O’NeilHarry Burns

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 1 hour ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Lenny Mills

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Related Images

boogie-jmx

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Fresh Boogie Band
    Fresh Boogie Band band photo

Connected Musicians

  • City Sound
  • Colin Bell
  • Eddie Hill
  • Harry Burns
  • Hugh O’Neil
  • James Meredith
  • Peter Niblock
    Peter Niblock band photo
  • Raymond Carroll
  • Robin McAuley
    Robin McAuley band photo

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.84% of network
(33.18M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.84%)
  • Peter Niblock (7.37%)
  • James Meredith (1.84%)
  • Colin Bell (1.84%)
  • Harry Burns (1.84%)
  • Raymond Carroll (0.46%)
  • Eddie Hill (0.46%)
  • Hugh O’Neil (0.46%)
  • City Sound (0.46%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Robin McAuley 46.08%Fresh Boogie Band 37.33%
Influence Score
i
9.09% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (9.09%)
  • Fresh Boogie Band (9.09%)
  • Peter Niblock (9.09%)
  • James Meredith (9.09%)
  • Robin McAuley (9.09%)
  • Colin Bell (9.09%)
  • Harry Burns (9.09%)
  • Raymond Carroll (9.09%)
  • Eddie Hill (9.09%)
  • Hugh O’Neil (9.09%)
  • City Sound (9.09%)
Direct Connections 4

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 2) = 2
$outbound = max(1, 2) = 2

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 2 * 2 = 4
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 2 / 2 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 10 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 4 *
                           ( 81 [Fresh Boogie Band] *
                            16 [Peter Niblock] *
                            4 [James Meredith] *
                            100 [Robin McAuley] *
                            4 [Colin Bell] *
                            4 [Harry Burns] *
                            1 [Raymond Carroll] *
                            1 [Eddie Hill] *
                            1 [Hugh O’Neil] *
                            1 [City Sound]
                           )

                         = 33.18M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Fresh Boogie Band] *
                            1 [Peter Niblock] *
                            1 [James Meredith] *
                            1 [Robin McAuley] *
                            1 [Colin Bell] *
                            1 [Harry Burns] *
                            1 [Raymond Carroll] *
                            1 [Eddie Hill] *
                            1 [Hugh O’Neil] *
                            1 [City Sound]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 2 Tags on post
Inbound 2 Posts tagging this
Connections 10 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 4
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.84% (33.18M overall)
  • This Post (1.84%)
  • Peter Niblock (7.37%)
  • James Meredith (1.84%)
  • Colin Bell (1.84%)
  • Harry Burns (1.84%)
  • Raymond Carroll (0.46%)
  • Eddie Hill (0.46%)
  • Hugh O’Neil (0.46%)
  • City Sound (0.46%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Robin McAuley 46.08%Fresh Boogie Band 37.33%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
9.09% (1 overall)
  • This Post (9.09%)
  • Fresh Boogie Band (9.09%)
  • Peter Niblock (9.09%)
  • James Meredith (9.09%)
  • Robin McAuley (9.09%)
  • Colin Bell (9.09%)
  • Harry Burns (9.09%)
  • Raymond Carroll (9.09%)
  • Eddie Hill (9.09%)
  • Hugh O’Neil (9.09%)
  • City Sound (9.09%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Fresh Boogie Band ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
Peter Niblock ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
James Meredith ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Robin McAuley ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1
Colin Bell ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Harry Burns ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Raymond Carroll ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Eddie Hill ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Hugh O’Neil ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
City Sound ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
City Sound ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Hugh O’Neil ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Eddie Hill ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Raymond Carroll ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Harry Burns ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Colin Bell ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Robin McAuley ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1
James Meredith ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Peter Niblock ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Fresh Boogie Band ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (2)
City sound
Fresh Boogie Band
Inbound Posts (2)
Fresh Boogie Band
City Sound
Last calculated: Jun 20, 5:50 PM
41

Related Content

No related content found.