Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Deströyer 666
Dani Ben HaimRoland Cohen (2)Yoni Ben HaimAdam WilkinsonCruciamentumTom McKenna

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 21 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Grave Miasma

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Cruciamentum
  • Deströyer 666
    Deströyer 666 band photo

Connected Musicians

  • Adam Wilkinson
  • Dani Ben Haim
  • Roland Cohen (2)
  • Tom McKenna
  • Yoni Ben Haim

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
6.04% of network
(14.29M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (6.04%)
  • Roland Cohen (2) (2.17%)
  • Dani Ben Haim (0.97%)
  • Adam Wilkinson (0.24%)
  • Tom McKenna (0.24%)
  • Yoni Ben Haim (0.24%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Deströyer 666 78.26%Cruciamentum 11.84%
Influence Score
i
12.50% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Roland Cohen (2) (12.50%)
  • Dani Ben Haim (12.50%)
  • Adam Wilkinson (12.50%)
  • Tom McKenna (12.50%)
  • Yoni Ben Haim (12.50%)
  • Cruciamentum (12.50%)
  • Deströyer 666 (12.50%)
Direct Connections 10

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 5) = 5
$outbound = max(1, 5) = 5

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 5 * 5 = 25
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 5 / 5 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 7 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 25 *
                           ( 9 [Roland Cohen (2)] *
                            4 [Dani Ben Haim] *
                            1 [Adam Wilkinson] *
                            1 [Tom McKenna] *
                            1 [Yoni Ben Haim] *
                            49 [Cruciamentum] *
                            324 [Deströyer 666]
                           )

                         = 14.29M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Roland Cohen (2)] *
                            1 [Dani Ben Haim] *
                            1 [Adam Wilkinson] *
                            1 [Tom McKenna] *
                            1 [Yoni Ben Haim] *
                            1 [Cruciamentum] *
                            1 [Deströyer 666]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 5 Tags on post
Inbound 5 Posts tagging this
Connections 7 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 25
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
6.04% (14.29M overall)
  • This Post (6.04%)
  • Roland Cohen (2) (2.17%)
  • Dani Ben Haim (0.97%)
  • Adam Wilkinson (0.24%)
  • Tom McKenna (0.24%)
  • Yoni Ben Haim (0.24%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Deströyer 666 78.26%Cruciamentum 11.84%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
12.50% (1 overall)
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Roland Cohen (2) (12.50%)
  • Dani Ben Haim (12.50%)
  • Adam Wilkinson (12.50%)
  • Tom McKenna (12.50%)
  • Yoni Ben Haim (12.50%)
  • Cruciamentum (12.50%)
  • Deströyer 666 (12.50%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Roland Cohen (2) ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Dani Ben Haim ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Adam Wilkinson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tom McKenna ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Yoni Ben Haim ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Cruciamentum ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Deströyer 666 ↗
Str: 324Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Deströyer 666 ↗
Str: 324Inf: 1
Cruciamentum ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Yoni Ben Haim ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tom McKenna ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Adam Wilkinson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Dani Ben Haim ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Roland Cohen (2) ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (5)
Adam Wilkinson
Dani Ben Haim
Roland Cohen (2)
Tom McKenna
Yoni Ben Haim
Inbound Posts (5)
Roland Cohen (2)
Dani Ben Haim
Adam Wilkinson
Tom McKenna
Yoni Ben Haim
Last calculated: Jun 24, 2:56 AM
37

Related Content

No related content found.