Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

HyperheadIan Hoxley
Pop Will Eat Itself
Apollo 440ROBBER BYKERKevin Hyde (2)Tony Byker

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 16 hours ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 4 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Gaye Bykers on Acid

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Apollo 440
  • Hyperhead
  • Pop Will Eat Itself
    Pop Will Eat Itself band photo

Connected Musicians

  • Ian Hoxley
  • Kevin Hyde (2)
  • ROBBER BYKER
  • Tony Byker

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
5.25% of network
(151.78M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (5.25%)
  • Apollo 440 (39.67%)
  • Pop Will Eat Itself (32.79%)
  • Hyperhead (16.07%)
  • Ian Hoxley (5.25%)
  • Kevin Hyde (2) (0.33%)
  • ROBBER BYKER (0.33%)
  • Tony Byker (0.33%)
Influence Score
i
12.50% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Ian Hoxley (12.50%)
  • Kevin Hyde (2) (12.50%)
  • ROBBER BYKER (12.50%)
  • Tony Byker (12.50%)
  • Pop Will Eat Itself (12.50%)
  • Apollo 440 (12.50%)
  • Hyperhead (12.50%)
Direct Connections 8

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 4) = 4
$outbound = max(1, 4) = 4

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 4 * 4 = 16
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 4 / 4 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 7 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 16 *
                           ( 16 [Ian Hoxley] *
                            1 [Kevin Hyde (2)] *
                            1 [ROBBER BYKER] *
                            1 [Tony Byker] *
                            100 [Pop Will Eat Itself] *
                            121 [Apollo 440] *
                            49 [Hyperhead]
                           )

                         = 151.78M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Ian Hoxley] *
                            1 [Kevin Hyde (2)] *
                            1 [ROBBER BYKER] *
                            1 [Tony Byker] *
                            1 [Pop Will Eat Itself] *
                            1 [Apollo 440] *
                            1 [Hyperhead]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 4 Tags on post
Inbound 4 Posts tagging this
Connections 7 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 16
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
5.25% (151.78M overall)
  • This Post (5.25%)
  • Apollo 440 (39.67%)
  • Pop Will Eat Itself (32.79%)
  • Hyperhead (16.07%)
  • Ian Hoxley (5.25%)
  • Kevin Hyde (2) (0.33%)
  • ROBBER BYKER (0.33%)
  • Tony Byker (0.33%)
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
12.50% (1 overall)
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Ian Hoxley (12.50%)
  • Kevin Hyde (2) (12.50%)
  • ROBBER BYKER (12.50%)
  • Tony Byker (12.50%)
  • Pop Will Eat Itself (12.50%)
  • Apollo 440 (12.50%)
  • Hyperhead (12.50%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Ian Hoxley ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Kevin Hyde (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
ROBBER BYKER ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tony Byker ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pop Will Eat Itself ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1
Apollo 440 ↗
Str: 121Inf: 1
Hyperhead ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Hyperhead ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Apollo 440 ↗
Str: 121Inf: 1
Pop Will Eat Itself ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1
Tony Byker ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
ROBBER BYKER ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Kevin Hyde (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ian Hoxley ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (4)
Ian Hoxley
Kevin Hyde (2)
ROBBER BYKER
Tony Byker
Inbound Posts (4)
Ian Hoxley
Kevin Hyde (2)
ROBBER BYKER
Tony Byker
Last calculated: Jul 3, 11:49 AM
34

Related Content

No related content found.