Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Death Valley National Park
Death ValleyMormon PointBarker RanchFurnace CreekPanamint Springs, CaliforniaTeakettle Junction, California
Structures in Death Valley National Park

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 1 hour ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Topography of Death Valley National Park

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Related Images

Landforms of Death Valley National Park
Geomorphology of Death Valley National Park

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.04% of network
(4.5K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.04%)
  • Furnace Creek (4.17%)
  • Barker Ranch (1.04%)
  • Mormon Point (1.04%)
  • Structures in Death Valley National Park (1.04%)
  • Panamint Springs, California (1.04%)
  • Teakettle Junction, California (1.04%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Death Valley National Park 72.92%Death Valley 16.67%
Influence Score
i
8.05% of network
(5.71)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (8.05%)
  • Death Valley (32.18%)
  • Death Valley National Park (11.49%)
  • Barker Ranch (8.05%)
  • Furnace Creek (8.05%)
  • Mormon Point (8.05%)
  • Structures in Death Valley National Park (8.05%)
  • Panamint Springs, California (8.05%)
  • Teakettle Junction, California (8.05%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 16 [Death Valley] *
                            70 [Death Valley National Park] *
                            1 [Barker Ranch] *
                            4 [Furnace Creek] *
                            1 [Mormon Point] *
                            1 [Structures in Death Valley National Park] *
                            1 [Panamint Springs, California] *
                            1 [Teakettle Junction, California]
                           )

                         = 4.5K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 4 [Death Valley] *
                            1.43 [Death Valley National Park] *
                            1 [Barker Ranch] *
                            1 [Furnace Creek] *
                            1 [Mormon Point] *
                            1 [Structures in Death Valley National Park] *
                            1 [Panamint Springs, California] *
                            1 [Teakettle Junction, California]
                           )

                         = 5.71
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.04% (4.5K overall)
  • This Post (1.04%)
  • Furnace Creek (4.17%)
  • Barker Ranch (1.04%)
  • Mormon Point (1.04%)
  • Structures in Death Valley National Park (1.04%)
  • Panamint Springs, California (1.04%)
  • Teakettle Junction, California (1.04%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Death Valley National Park 72.92%Death Valley 16.67%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
8.05% (5.71 overall)
  • This Post (8.05%)
  • Death Valley (32.18%)
  • Death Valley National Park (11.49%)
  • Barker Ranch (8.05%)
  • Furnace Creek (8.05%)
  • Mormon Point (8.05%)
  • Structures in Death Valley National Park (8.05%)
  • Panamint Springs, California (8.05%)
  • Teakettle Junction, California (8.05%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Death Valley ↗
Str: 16Inf: 4
Death Valley National Park ↗
Str: 70Inf: 1.43
Barker Ranch ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Furnace Creek ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Mormon Point ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Structures in Death Valley National Park ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Panamint Springs, California ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Teakettle Junction, California ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Teakettle Junction, California ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Panamint Springs, California ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Structures in Death Valley National Park ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mormon Point ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Furnace Creek ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Barker Ranch ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Death Valley National Park ↗
Str: 70Inf: 1.43
Death Valley ↗
Str: 16Inf: 4

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Death Valley National Park
BROKEN LINK
Inbound Posts (1)
No other posts link to this one yet.
Last calculated: Jul 1, 1:28 PM
21

Related Content

Locations

  • Mormon Point
  • Death Valley National Park
  • Barker Ranch
  • Death Valley

Topics

  • Structures in Death Valley National Park
  • Panamint Springs, California
  • Teakettle Junction, California
  • Furnace Creek