Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Phillip Tubbs (2)Jacob TomskyGreg Gonzalez (3)Emily Davis (8)Cigarettes After SexRandy Miller (11)Greg LeahGreg Leeah

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 4 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Steve Herrada

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Cigarettes After Sex

Connected Musicians

  • Emily Davis (8)
  • Greg Gonzalez (3)
  • Greg Leah
  • Greg Leeah
  • Jacob Tomsky
  • Phillip Tubbs (2)
  • Randy Miller (11)

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.39% of network
(64)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.39%)
  • Emily Davis (8) (1.39%)
  • Greg Gonzalez (3) (1.39%)
  • Greg Leah (1.39%)
  • Greg Leeah (1.39%)
  • Jacob Tomsky (1.39%)
  • Phillip Tubbs (2) (1.39%)
  • Randy Miller (11) (1.39%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Cigarettes After Sex 88.89%
Influence Score
i
11.11% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Cigarettes After Sex (11.11%)
  • Emily Davis (8) (11.11%)
  • Greg Gonzalez (3) (11.11%)
  • Greg Leah (11.11%)
  • Greg Leeah (11.11%)
  • Jacob Tomsky (11.11%)
  • Phillip Tubbs (2) (11.11%)
  • Randy Miller (11) (11.11%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 64 [Cigarettes After Sex] *
                            1 [Emily Davis (8)] *
                            1 [Greg Gonzalez (3)] *
                            1 [Greg Leah] *
                            1 [Greg Leeah] *
                            1 [Jacob Tomsky] *
                            1 [Phillip Tubbs (2)] *
                            1 [Randy Miller (11)]
                           )

                         = 64

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Cigarettes After Sex] *
                            1 [Emily Davis (8)] *
                            1 [Greg Gonzalez (3)] *
                            1 [Greg Leah] *
                            1 [Greg Leeah] *
                            1 [Jacob Tomsky] *
                            1 [Phillip Tubbs (2)] *
                            1 [Randy Miller (11)]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.39% (64 overall)
  • This Post (1.39%)
  • Emily Davis (8) (1.39%)
  • Greg Gonzalez (3) (1.39%)
  • Greg Leah (1.39%)
  • Greg Leeah (1.39%)
  • Jacob Tomsky (1.39%)
  • Phillip Tubbs (2) (1.39%)
  • Randy Miller (11) (1.39%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Cigarettes After Sex 88.89%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.11% (1 overall)
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Cigarettes After Sex (11.11%)
  • Emily Davis (8) (11.11%)
  • Greg Gonzalez (3) (11.11%)
  • Greg Leah (11.11%)
  • Greg Leeah (11.11%)
  • Jacob Tomsky (11.11%)
  • Phillip Tubbs (2) (11.11%)
  • Randy Miller (11) (11.11%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Cigarettes After Sex ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Emily Davis (8) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Greg Gonzalez (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Greg Leah ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Greg Leeah ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jacob Tomsky ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Phillip Tubbs (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Randy Miller (11) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Randy Miller (11) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Phillip Tubbs (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jacob Tomsky ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Greg Leeah ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Greg Leah ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Greg Gonzalez (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Emily Davis (8) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Cigarettes After Sex ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Cigarettes After Sex
Inbound Posts (1)
Cigarettes After Sex
Last calculated: Jun 26, 6:27 PM
23

Related Content

No related content found.