Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Johan Niemann
Creighton DoaneHarem ScaremFirst SignalStan MiczekRubber (6)Barry DonaghyPete LesperanceDarren Smith (7)Mike Gionet

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Harry Hess

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • First Signal
  • Harem Scarem
  • Rubber (6)

Connected Musicians

  • Barry Donaghy
  • Creighton Doane
  • Darren Smith (7)
  • Johan Niemann
    Johan Niemann band photo
  • Mike Gionet
  • Pete Lesperance
  • Stan Miczek

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
5.33% of network
(46.29M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (5.33%)
  • Stan Miczek (5.33%)
  • Pete Lesperance (5.33%)
  • First Signal (2.37%)
  • Rubber (6) (2.37%)
  • Barry Donaghy (0.59%)
  • Creighton Doane (0.59%)
  • Darren Smith (7) (0.59%)
  • Mike Gionet (0.59%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Johan Niemann 47.93%Harem Scarem 28.99%
Influence Score
i
9.09% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (9.09%)
  • Harem Scarem (9.09%)
  • Stan Miczek (9.09%)
  • Barry Donaghy (9.09%)
  • Creighton Doane (9.09%)
  • Darren Smith (7) (9.09%)
  • Mike Gionet (9.09%)
  • Pete Lesperance (9.09%)
  • Johan Niemann (9.09%)
  • First Signal (9.09%)
  • Rubber (6) (9.09%)
Direct Connections 6

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 3) = 3
$outbound = max(1, 3) = 3

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 3 * 3 = 9
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 3 / 3 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 10 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 9 *
                           ( 49 [Harem Scarem] *
                            9 [Stan Miczek] *
                            1 [Barry Donaghy] *
                            1 [Creighton Doane] *
                            1 [Darren Smith (7)] *
                            1 [Mike Gionet] *
                            9 [Pete Lesperance] *
                            81 [Johan Niemann] *
                            4 [First Signal] *
                            4 [Rubber (6)]
                           )

                         = 46.29M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Harem Scarem] *
                            1 [Stan Miczek] *
                            1 [Barry Donaghy] *
                            1 [Creighton Doane] *
                            1 [Darren Smith (7)] *
                            1 [Mike Gionet] *
                            1 [Pete Lesperance] *
                            1 [Johan Niemann] *
                            1 [First Signal] *
                            1 [Rubber (6)]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 3 Tags on post
Inbound 3 Posts tagging this
Connections 10 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 9
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
5.33% (46.29M overall)
  • This Post (5.33%)
  • Stan Miczek (5.33%)
  • Pete Lesperance (5.33%)
  • First Signal (2.37%)
  • Rubber (6) (2.37%)
  • Barry Donaghy (0.59%)
  • Creighton Doane (0.59%)
  • Darren Smith (7) (0.59%)
  • Mike Gionet (0.59%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Johan Niemann 47.93%Harem Scarem 28.99%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
9.09% (1 overall)
  • This Post (9.09%)
  • Harem Scarem (9.09%)
  • Stan Miczek (9.09%)
  • Barry Donaghy (9.09%)
  • Creighton Doane (9.09%)
  • Darren Smith (7) (9.09%)
  • Mike Gionet (9.09%)
  • Pete Lesperance (9.09%)
  • Johan Niemann (9.09%)
  • First Signal (9.09%)
  • Rubber (6) (9.09%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Harem Scarem ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Stan Miczek ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Barry Donaghy ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Creighton Doane ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Darren Smith (7) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mike Gionet ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pete Lesperance ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Johan Niemann ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
First Signal ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Rubber (6) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Rubber (6) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
First Signal ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Johan Niemann ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
Pete Lesperance ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Mike Gionet ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Darren Smith (7) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Creighton Doane ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Barry Donaghy ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Stan Miczek ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Harem Scarem ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (3)
First Signal
Harem Scarem
Rubber (6)
Inbound Posts (3)
Harem Scarem
First Signal
Rubber (6)
Last calculated: Jun 25, 1:14 AM
47

Related Content

No related content found.