Skip to content

Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Bobb TrimbleHarry PussyAdris HoyosIan SteinbergMark FeehanDan HoskerVerbal CircusTrash Monkeys (2)KKYLPWatt (2)

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 4 days ago
Comments: 0

Francesca Ladybird
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Matthew Leech
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 1

Jessica
Last login: 3 months ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 3 months ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 3 months ago
Comments: 0

Bill Orcutt

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Harry Pussy
  • KKYLP
  • Trash Monkeys (2)
  • Verbal Circus
  • Wahoos
  • Watt (2)

Connected Musicians

  • Adris Hoyos
  • Bobb Trimble
  • Dan Hosker
  • Ian Steinberg
  • Mark Feehan

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
30.77% of network
(46.7K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (30.77%)
  • Mark Feehan (0.85%)
  • Adris Hoyos (0.85%)
  • Dan Hosker (0.85%)
  • Ian Steinberg (0.85%)
  • KKYLP (0.85%)
  • Trash Monkeys (2) (0.85%)
  • Verbal Circus (0.85%)
  • Wahoos (0.85%)
  • Watt (2) (0.85%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Bobb Trimble 30.77%Harry Pussy 30.77%
Influence Score
i
8.33% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (8.33%)
  • Bobb Trimble (8.33%)
  • Harry Pussy (8.33%)
  • Mark Feehan (8.33%)
  • Adris Hoyos (8.33%)
  • Dan Hosker (8.33%)
  • Ian Steinberg (8.33%)
  • KKYLP (8.33%)
  • Trash Monkeys (2) (8.33%)
  • Verbal Circus (8.33%)
  • Wahoos (8.33%)
  • Watt (2) (8.33%)
Direct Connections 12

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 6) = 6
$outbound = max(1, 6) = 6

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 6 * 6 = 36
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 6 / 6 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 11 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 36 *
                           ( 36 [Bobb Trimble] *
                            36 [Harry Pussy] *
                            1 [Mark Feehan] *
                            1 [Adris Hoyos] *
                            1 [Dan Hosker] *
                            1 [Ian Steinberg] *
                            1 [KKYLP] *
                            1 [Trash Monkeys (2)] *
                            1 [Verbal Circus] *
                            1 [Wahoos] *
                            1 [Watt (2)]
                           )

                         = 46.7K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Bobb Trimble] *
                            1 [Harry Pussy] *
                            1 [Mark Feehan] *
                            1 [Adris Hoyos] *
                            1 [Dan Hosker] *
                            1 [Ian Steinberg] *
                            1 [KKYLP] *
                            1 [Trash Monkeys (2)] *
                            1 [Verbal Circus] *
                            1 [Wahoos] *
                            1 [Watt (2)]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 6 Tags on post
Inbound 6 Posts tagging this
Connections 11 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 36
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
30.77% (46.7K overall)
  • This Post (30.77%)
  • Mark Feehan (0.85%)
  • Adris Hoyos (0.85%)
  • Dan Hosker (0.85%)
  • Ian Steinberg (0.85%)
  • KKYLP (0.85%)
  • Trash Monkeys (2) (0.85%)
  • Verbal Circus (0.85%)
  • Wahoos (0.85%)
  • Watt (2) (0.85%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Bobb Trimble 30.77%Harry Pussy 30.77%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
8.33% (1 overall)
  • This Post (8.33%)
  • Bobb Trimble (8.33%)
  • Harry Pussy (8.33%)
  • Mark Feehan (8.33%)
  • Adris Hoyos (8.33%)
  • Dan Hosker (8.33%)
  • Ian Steinberg (8.33%)
  • KKYLP (8.33%)
  • Trash Monkeys (2) (8.33%)
  • Verbal Circus (8.33%)
  • Wahoos (8.33%)
  • Watt (2) (8.33%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Bobb Trimble ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Harry Pussy ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Mark Feehan ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Adris Hoyos ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Dan Hosker ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ian Steinberg ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
KKYLP ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Trash Monkeys (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Verbal Circus ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Wahoos ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Watt (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Watt (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Wahoos ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Verbal Circus ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Trash Monkeys (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
KKYLP ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ian Steinberg ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Dan Hosker ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Adris Hoyos ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mark Feehan ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Harry Pussy ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Bobb Trimble ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (6)
Harry Pussy
KKYLP
Trash Monkeys (2)
Verbal Circus
Wahoos
Watt (2)
Inbound Posts (6)
Harry Pussy
KKYLP
Trash Monkeys (2)
Verbal Circus
Wahoos
Watt (2)
Last calculated: Oct 21, 1:39 PM
41

Related Content

No related content found.

A Muso community