Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Flogging Molly
Bad Religion
The Cult
Mike Dimkich
The Walker RoadersTed HuttHigh City MilesReacharoundSuckerpunch (5)Channel 3 (2)

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 3 days ago
Comments: 0

Francesca Ladybird
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Matthew Leech
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 1

Jessica
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Jact

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Bad Religion
    Bad Religion band photo
  • Channel 3 (2)
  • Flogging Molly
    Flogging Molly band photo
  • High City Miles
  • Reacharound
  • Suckerpunch (5)
  • The Cult
    The Cult band photo
  • The Walker Roaders

Connected Musicians

  • Mike Dimkich
    Mike Dimkich band photo
  • Ted Hutt

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.22% of network
(4.37T)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.22%)
  • Mike Dimkich (1.95%)
  • Ted Hutt (0.87%)
  • The Walker Roaders (0.87%)
  • Channel 3 (2) (0.05%)
  • Suckerpunch (5) (0.05%)
  • High City Miles (0.05%)
  • Reacharound (0.05%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Bad Religion 48.73%The Cult 36.60%Flogging Molly 10.56%
Influence Score
i
8.97% of network
(1.15)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (8.97%)
  • Flogging Molly (10.34%)
  • The Cult (8.97%)
  • Bad Religion (8.97%)
  • Mike Dimkich (8.97%)
  • Channel 3 (2) (8.97%)
  • Suckerpunch (5) (8.97%)
  • High City Miles (8.97%)
  • Ted Hutt (8.97%)
  • The Walker Roaders (8.97%)
  • Reacharound (8.97%)
Direct Connections 4

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 2) = 2
$outbound = max(1, 2) = 2

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 2 * 2 = 4
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 2 / 2 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 10 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 4 *
                           ( 195 [Flogging Molly] *
                            676 [The Cult] *
                            900 [Bad Religion] *
                            36 [Mike Dimkich] *
                            1 [Channel 3 (2)] *
                            1 [Suckerpunch (5)] *
                            1 [High City Miles] *
                            16 [Ted Hutt] *
                            16 [The Walker Roaders] *
                            1 [Reacharound]
                           )

                         = 4.37T

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.15 [Flogging Molly] *
                            1 [The Cult] *
                            1 [Bad Religion] *
                            1 [Mike Dimkich] *
                            1 [Channel 3 (2)] *
                            1 [Suckerpunch (5)] *
                            1 [High City Miles] *
                            1 [Ted Hutt] *
                            1 [The Walker Roaders] *
                            1 [Reacharound]
                           )

                         = 1.15
Outbound 2 Tags on post
Inbound 2 Posts tagging this
Connections 10 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 4
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.22% (4.37T overall)
  • This Post (0.22%)
  • Mike Dimkich (1.95%)
  • Ted Hutt (0.87%)
  • The Walker Roaders (0.87%)
  • Channel 3 (2) (0.05%)
  • Suckerpunch (5) (0.05%)
  • High City Miles (0.05%)
  • Reacharound (0.05%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Bad Religion 48.73%The Cult 36.60%Flogging Molly 10.56%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
8.97% (1.15 overall)
  • This Post (8.97%)
  • Flogging Molly (10.34%)
  • The Cult (8.97%)
  • Bad Religion (8.97%)
  • Mike Dimkich (8.97%)
  • Channel 3 (2) (8.97%)
  • Suckerpunch (5) (8.97%)
  • High City Miles (8.97%)
  • Ted Hutt (8.97%)
  • The Walker Roaders (8.97%)
  • Reacharound (8.97%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Flogging Molly ↗
Str: 195Inf: 1.15
The Cult ↗
Str: 676Inf: 1
Bad Religion ↗
Str: 900Inf: 1
Mike Dimkich ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Channel 3 (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Suckerpunch (5) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
High City Miles ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ted Hutt ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
The Walker Roaders ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Reacharound ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Reacharound ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
The Walker Roaders ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Ted Hutt ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
High City Miles ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Suckerpunch (5) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Channel 3 (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mike Dimkich ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Bad Religion ↗
Str: 900Inf: 1
The Cult ↗
Str: 676Inf: 1
Flogging Molly ↗
Str: 195Inf: 1.15

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (2)
Mike Dimkich
Ted Hutt
Inbound Posts (2)
Mike Dimkich
Ted Hutt
Last calculated: Sep 26, 6:14 AM
31

Related Content

No related content found.